Manchin: There Has Never Been a More Critical Time for Congress to Protect American Energy Security and Reclaim Energy Independence

Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Joe Manchin

December 13, 2022

Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV), Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, released the following statement urging his Senate colleagues to support the inclusion of bipartisan, comprehensive permitting reform as an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

“There has never been a more critical time in our nation’s history for Congress to act to protect American energy security and reclaim energy independence. I cannot go home and explain to West Virginians why the Senate would fail to support creating new energy jobs, producing more energy, and enhancing American energy security quickly. I struggle to understand how any of my colleagues could in good conscious consider voting against bipartisan, comprehensive energy permitting reform that benefits all types of energy as the American people continue to demand Congress put politics aside and act on commonsense solutions to solve the issues facing us. We have one such viable solution before us and I urge each of my colleagues to vote to ensure that this permitting reform legislation our country desperately needs is included in NDAA,” said Chairman Manchin.



Menendez Chairs Senate Banking Subcommittee Hearing to Examine How Capital Markets Serve Diverse Entrepreneurs and Investors

Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Bob Menendez

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), a senior member of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs and Chairman of the Banking Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment, today chaired a subcommittee hearing entitled: “Examining How Capital Markets Serve Diverse Entrepreneurs and Investors.” The hearing was convened by Chairman Menendez to highlight how women and people of color are dramatically underrepresented in capital markets and across the financial services industry, and how this ultimately hinders their access to economic opportunity, disproportionately hurts minority communities, and results in less equitable market outcomes.

 

“The fact of the matter is that underrepresentation has a trickle-down effect. When corporate leadership at the top is not diverse, unsurprisingly, the firms that manage their pensions are also not diverse,” Sen. Menendez said in his opening remarks. “When corporate leadership only reflects one thin slice of the population, their decisions will only benefit one slice of the population. And despite contributing trillions of dollars to the economy — being among the most likely to start a small business — many minorities across the country still lack access to the capital they need to thrive.”

 


[WATCH THE SENATOR’S OPENING REMARKS AND LINE OF QUESTIONING]

  

Sen. Menendez has been a champion in the fight to address diversity problems across the nation’s financial system and institutions. This September, Sen. Menendez sent a letter to Wells Fargo CEO and President Charles Scharf and Senior Vice President Bei Ling to express their deep concerns about the bank’s reported practice of conducting “fake interviews” with women and minority candidates after already filling vacancies to inflate their diversity statistics. Earlier this summer, he led a group of colleagues in sending letters to 25 companies, who control some of the largest corporate pension plans in the country, requesting information about the diversity among asset managers of these plans and the institution’s practices in seeking, selecting, and retaining diverse-owned asset management firms to manage their pension and or treasury funds. Last year in October, the Senator led several efforts urging SEC Chair Gary Gensler to expeditiously adoption the AMAC’s D&I Subcommittee’s recommendations to promote greater transparency and diversity among asset managers and for David A. Jones, the then-Acting Chairman of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, to create opportunities for federal workers to invest in funds run by diverse asset managers.

 

Sen. Menendez has also led the charge to further diversify corporate America by authoring the Improving Corporate Governance Through Diversity Act of 2021, legislation that would address shortcomings in the SEC’s diversity disclosure rule by requiring public companies to disclose information related to the racial, gender, ethnic makeup and veteran status of corporate boards and senior management. For well over a decade, the Senator has also regularly conducted corporate diversity surveys of the largest companies in the country to assess whether or not they are making timely progress on their diversity objectives.

  

Sen. Menendez’s opening remarks, as prepared for delivery, can be found below:

 

“This hybrid hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment will come to order.

 

Thank you all for being here today.

 

A few reminders before we begin — for those of you participating virtually, once you start speaking, there will be a slight delay before you are displayed on screen.

 

Also, to minimize any background noise, please make sure you remained muted until it is your turn to speak.

 

Turning now to the subject of today’s hearing, we are here because our economy has a fundamental problem.

 

Across corporate America, those in charge are overwhelmingly white and disproportionately male.

 

In a recent analysis of over 3,000 U.S. firms listed on either the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ, researchers at Cornell found that racial minorities held only about 12% of board seats in 2019 — with over 40% of all U.S. boards composed of only white directors[1]

 

In asset management we see a similar story.

 

Of the $70 trillion in global financial assets under management, less than 1% of are managed by women- or minority-owned firms.

 

Now some may wonder why this a problem.

 

Why should the federal government have an interest in the diversity of publicly traded companies?

 

The answer is simple – it’s because it is material information that investors should have when deciding where to put their money.

 

In study after study — including those conducted by the consulting firm McKinsey — researchers have found that a diverse workforce leads to a more productive and profitable company.

 

The reasons for this are varied, but whether it’s because of smarter and more inclusive decision-making, increased creativity and problem-solving, or greater recruitment and retention, the bottom line is this: A company whose governing structure looks like America is a company that can compete on the global market.

 

Which brings us to this hearing.

 

The current lack of diversity in capital markets, businesses, and financial institutions creates a ripple effect across the ecosystem.

 

It negatively affects entrepreneurs and investors, makes companies less competitive, and stalls our nation’s progress towards a truly equitable marketplace.

 

In short, a lack of diversity means that American companies are fighting to compete with one hand tied behind their backs.

 

It’s an issue that I have been following personally for years — and in the past, my office has issued corporate diversity surveys of Fortune 100 companies.

 

What we have found is that, while many of these companies believe in the idea of increasing diversity among their senior leadership, very few have made real progress on the matter.

 

It is why I introduced a bill, the Improving Corporate Governance Through Diversity Act of 2021.

 

My legislation would promote greater transparency in corporate America by requiring public companies to disclose specific information related to the racial, gender, ethnic makeup and veteran status of corporate boards and senior management and whether they have policies in place to promote diversity in their leadership.

 

It’s a bill that I’m proud to say has strong support across the ideological spectrum — from the US Chamber of Commerce to the National Urban League.

 

And it goes hand in hand with what SEC’s Asset Management Advisory Committee has urged the asset management industry to adopt.

 

The AMAC Subcommittee of Diversity and Inclusion have pushed for greater disclosure of the gender and racial makeup of firms.

 

This increased transparency would not only improve performance to the benefit of investors, it would also further the SEC’s diversity and inclusion goals and its mandate to facilitate fair and open markets.

 

It is my hope that the SEC soon enacts all of these recommendations and that we can pass my Improving Corporate Governance Through Diversity Act.

 

Lastly, I’d just like to note what greater diversity means for investors and entrepreneurs in minority communities, and I say this because I know it’s of particular interest to both Ranking Member Scott and me.

 

The fact of the matter is that underrepresentation has a trickle-down effect.

 

When corporate leadership at the top is not diverse, unsurprisingly, the firms that manage their pensions are also not diverse.

 

When corporate leadership only reflects one thin slice of the population, their decisions will only benefit one slice of the population.

 

And despite contributing trillions of dollars to the economy — being among the most likely to start a small business — many minorities across the country still lack access to the capital they need to thrive.

 

We all saw this firsthand during COVID when minority business owners struggled to access the PPP program.

 

So the goal of today’s hearing is to explore these issues further — to discuss solutions that work for women and minority communities who are too often neglected by traditional financial services and in the capital markets.

 

And with that I want to thank our witnesses for appearing and for sharing their testimony with us today.

 

I now turn it over to Ranking Member Scott for his opening remarks.”


[1] https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2022/01/17/what-drives-racial-diversity-on-u-s-corporate-boards/#:~:text=Racial%20minorities%20held%20only%20about,share%20has%20increased%20to%2040%25.

HYDE-SMITH SAYS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S ‘SOCIALLY OPTIMAL’ ENERGY PRODUCTION STANDARD INCONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW

Source: United States Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss)

HYDE-SMITH SAYS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S ‘SOCIALLY OPTIMAL’ ENERGY PRODUCTION STANDARD INCONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW


VIDEO:  Senator Hyde-Smith Questions Use of “Socially Optimal” Standard to Govern Energy Production.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) today questioned the legal authority behind a “socially optimal” standard used by the U.S. Department of the Interior to develop long-delayed regulations and guidelines for offshore energy production.

Hyde-Smith raised the issue during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing to examine the Interior Department’s implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA).  The “socially optimal” term is used in documentation regarding imposing higher production surcharges to lower production in the Cook Inlet, Alaska.

“I think we should be wary of the term ‘socially optimal’ as it is both ambiguous and subjective, and not even in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act that governs offshore energy production activities off the Mississippi Gulf Coast,” Hyde-Smith said following the hearing.

The final notice of sale and Record of Decision for the Cook Inlet included documentation discussing increased rental and royalty rates that stated “a surcharge of 12 percent to account for the social costs of Greenhouse Gas (GHGs) emissions,” and that the higher rate could cause Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) activity and corresponding production to “move toward a lower, but more socially optimal level.”

Questioned by Hyde-Smith for the law that authorizes the Interior Department to assess fees for the social cost of carbon, specifically by way of royalty rates, Deputy Secretary Tommy P. Beaudreau said, “There’s not such a provision under OCSLA that I’m aware of.”

“The social cost of carbon is used as a disclosure tool to provide the public with information about the full potential impacts of oil and gas activity.  But there is not a preconceived socially optimal level that we work towards,” Beaudreau said.

Hyde-Smith also questioned missed deadlines to fulfill the IIJA deadline for promulgating regulations governing OCS carbon transportation and sequestration.  The missed Nov. 15, 2022, deadline is among Hyde-Smith’s concerns about the Department of the Interior continually missing targets for releasing a new five-year plan for conducting future lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico.

###

Sen. Braun and Rep. Womack introduce legislation to protect tipped workers

Source: United States Senator Mike Braun (Indiana)

WASHINGTON—Today, Senator Mike Braun introduced legislation to clarify the definition of tipped employee and relieve reporting burdens that are harming the restaurant community. Representative Steve Womack (R-Ark.) introduced the companion legislation in the House.
 
“The Biden administration’s confusing compliance rule creates an unnecessary reporting burden for restaurants that are already going through a difficult time. This legislation will help streamline regulations for tipped employees so that restaurants and their workers can thrive.”—Sen. Mike Braun
 
“The consequences of this Biden administration rule include layoffs and cut wages. With an ailing economy and soaring inflation, the heavy hand of the federal government clawing into the pay of hardworking Americans is the last thing restaurant workers need. Our bill brings much-needed certainty to servers by protecting their income and job opportunities.”—Rep. Steve Womack
 
The Tipped Employee Protection Act of 2022 would:

  • Amend the FLSA definition of tipped employee to create a more explicit definition of the term by removing interpretive language (customarily and regularly), providing additional clarity and simplicity in categorizing individuals as tipped employees.
  • Restrict the ability of judges or the administration to set arbitrary limits or requirements in classifying the hours or duties that a tipped employee performs.  
  • Preserve the tipped wage and the protection in the FLSA that tipped employees that receive at least the minimum wage between the addition of an employer-paid cash wage of $2.13 and tips—and in many cases much more. If an individual’s tips do not reach the applicable minimum wage under that formula, the employer would still be required to pay any difference. 
  • Retain the ability of states under the FLSA to set wages higher than the federal statutory minimum, meaning that any state could continue to independently set the wage.

 
Full bill text here.
 
# # #

Portman Praises The Respect for Marriage Act Becoming Law

Source: United States Senator for Ohio Rob Portman

December 13, 2022 | Press Releases

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-OH), a cosponsor of The Respect for Marriage Act and key supporter of the legislation, commented on the bipartisan Respect for Marriage Act being signed into law after attending the signing ceremony at the White House:

“This is a momentous day for our country and so many families I represent. I am proud of my colleagues who reached across the aisle and worked hard to ensure this legislation passed in the House and Senate. The majority of the American people want this issue settled, and now that this bill is law, millions of married couples will get the certainty and peace of mind they deserve by having their marriage protected.

“The Supreme Court acknowledged same-sex marriage as a constitutional right in 2015, yet current law allows states and the federal government to refuse to recognize valid same-sex marriages. The Respect for Marriage Act simply guarantees that valid same-sex marriages from one state will be recognized by the federal government and other states. It ensures that valid marriages between two individuals are given full faith and credit, regardless of the couple’s sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin.

“Throughout this process, I listened to the concerns raised by religious organizations and worked with my colleagues to include substantial new religious liberty protections in the bill while still preserving the rights of same-sex married couples.

“My colleagues and I developed an amendment with religious organizations that ensures religious convictions are protected. A group of constitutional scholars and advocates for religious liberty analyzed the bill and tour amendment and concluded that it does not pose new litigation risks to faith-based groups, but instead contains important new protections that will now be enshrined into the law.

“The legislation demonstrates that the rights of same-sex couples can coexist with religious freedom protections and that the rights of both groups can be advanced when people come together and work in good faith.

“I commend my colleagues on both sides of the aisle who came together to get this bill across the finish line.”

###

Rubio, Donalds Request of Further FEMA Assistance in Wake of Hurricane Ian

Source: United States Senator for Florida Marco Rubio

On September 28, 2022, Hurricane Ian made landfall on Florida’s west coast. The deadly storm devastated communities, and its effects will be felt for years.  
 
U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and U.S. Representative Byron Donalds (R-FL), along with other members of the Florida delegation, sent a letter to President Joe Biden requesting the President approve 100 percent cost share for eligible expenses until January 19, 2023.

  • “More than two months since Ian made landfall, our communities are still reeling. Debris generated by the storm from wrecked houses and infrastructure is still piled high, stretched from southwest to northeast Florida.”
  • “Hurricane Ian also caused the catastrophic failure of numerous bridges.  The reality on the ground shows that our communities need more time.  Lee County is estimated that debris removal could cost $500 million – about half of the county’s annual operating budget.”

Want more information? Read the full letter here, click here for a full list of cosigners, and see below for a list of Rubio’s previous actions in response to Hurricane Ian.

Reed Joins DOE to Celebrate U.S. Scientists Reaching Breakthrough in Race Toward Fusion

Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

WASHINGTON, DC — Today, at a special ceremony in our nation’s capital, Secretary of Energy Jennifer M. Granholm announced that on December 5 at the National Ignition Facility (NIF), which is part of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California (LLNL), U.S. scientists achieved “ignition” — a fusion reaction producing more energy than it took to create.  This breakthrough marks a critical milestone for nuclear fusion and a step toward generating abundant clean energy.

U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI), the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, joined Secretary Granholm today, along with National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Administrator Jill Hruby; and White House Office of Science and Technology officials and LLNL officials to announce the major scientific achievement which kindles hopes for a brighter clean energy future. 

Comparing the news to the Wright brothers breakthrough flight near Kitty Hawk in 1903 that helped launch modern aviation, Senator Reed proclaimed that the U.S. Department of Energy researchers had shown the world what is possible and will help spark a future clean energy revolution.

“This is a great triumph for American ingenuity and scientific advancement.  DOE’s ignition achievement is one for the history books.  This experiment produced a modest amount of energy, but such humble beginnings are foundational for future achievement.  With a flight that travelled 120 feet in twelve seconds, the Wright Brothers set us on a course to take to the skies and heavens above.  I hope this promising breakthrough will spark a similar trajectory of innovation and progress when it comes to fusion and clean energy,” said Senator Reed.  “By successfully creating ‘net energy’ through a nuclear fusion reaction, American researchers have pointed the way to a cleaner energy future.  We still have a long way to go to get there and there will be ups and downs along the way.  But this is a seminal moment worth celebrating.”

This historic, first-of-its kind achievement will provide unprecedented capability to support NNSA’s Stockpile Stewardship Program and will provide invaluable insights into the prospects of clean fusion energy, which would be a game-changer for efforts to achieve President Biden’s goal of a net-zero carbon economy.

“This is a landmark achievement for the researchers and staff at the National Ignition Facility who have dedicated their careers to seeing fusion ignition become a reality, and this milestone will undoubtedly spark even more discovery,” said Secretary Granholm. “The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to supporting our world-class scientists—like the team at NIF—whose work will help us solve humanity’s most complex and pressing problems, like providing clean power to combat climate change and maintaining a nuclear deterrent without nuclear testing.”

“We have had a theoretical understanding of fusion for over a century, but the journey from knowing to doing can be long and arduous. Today’s milestone shows what we can do with perseverance,” said Dr. Arati Prabhakar, the President’s Chief Advisor for Science and Technology and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

“Monday, December 5, 2022, was a historic day in science thanks to the incredible people at Livermore Lab and the National Ignition Facility. In making this breakthrough, they have opened a new chapter in NNSA’s Stockpile Stewardship Program,” said NNSA Administrator Jill Hruby. “I would like to thank the members of Congress who have supported the National Ignition Facility because their belief in the promise of visionary science has been critical for our mission. Our team from around the DOE national laboratories and our international partners have shown us the power of collaboration.”

“The pursuit of fusion ignition in the laboratory is one of the most significant scientific challenges ever tackled by humanity, and achieving it is a triumph of science, engineering, and most of all, people,” LLNL Director Dr. Kim Budil said. “Crossing this threshold is the vision that has driven 60 years of dedicated pursuit—a continual process of learning, building, expanding knowledge and capability, and then finding ways to overcome the new challenges that emerged. These are the problems that the U.S. national laboratories were created to solve.”

As Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a senior member of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, Reed has delivered significant federal funding to advance NNSA’s mission and capabilities of enhancing national security through nuclear science and maintaining a safe and reliable nuclear deterrent.  This year’s NDAA, which passed the House last week and will be considered by the Senate in the coming days, includes $22.3 billion for NNSA programs.  This includes a record $624 million for the Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) program.

“This is an historic, innovative achievement that builds on the contributions of generations of Livermore scientists. Today, our nation stands on their collective shoulders. We still have a long way to go, but this is a critical step and I commend the U.S. Department of Energy and all who contributed toward this promising breakthrough, which could help fuel a brighter clean energy future for the United States and humanity,” noted Reed.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, LLNL’s experiment surpassed the fusion threshold by delivering 2.05 megajoules (MJ) of energy to the target, resulting in 3.15 MJ of fusion energy output, demonstrating for the first time a most fundamental science basis for inertial fusion energy (IFE). Many advanced science and technology developments are still needed to achieve simple, affordable IFE to power homes and businesses, and DOE is currently restarting a broad-based, coordinated IFE program in the United States. Combined with private-sector investment, there is a lot of momentum to drive rapid progress toward fusion commercialization.

Fusion is the process by which two light nuclei combine to form a single heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy. In the 1960s, a group of pioneering scientists at LLNL hypothesized that lasers could be used to induce fusion in a laboratory setting. Led by physicist John Nuckolls, who later served as LLNL director from 1988 to 1994, this revolutionary idea became inertial confinement fusion, kicking off more than 60 years of research and development in lasers, optics, diagnostics, target fabrication, computer modeling and simulation, and experimental design.

To pursue this concept, LLNL built a series of increasingly powerful laser systems, leading to the creation of NIF, the world’s largest and most energetic laser system. NIF — located at LLNL in Livermore, California — is the size of a sports stadium and uses powerful laser beams to create temperatures and pressures like those in the cores of stars and giant planets, and inside exploding nuclear weapons.

Achieving ignition was made possible by dedication from LLNL employees as well as countless collaborators at DOE’s Los Alamos National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, and Nevada National Security Site; General Atomics; academic institutions, including the University of Rochester’s Laboratory for Laser Energetics, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of California, Berkeley, and Princeton University; international partners, including the United Kingdom’s Atomic Weapons Establishment and the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission; and stakeholders at DOE and NNSA and in Congress.

 

Statement of U.S. Sens. Warner and Kaine on Signing of Respect for Marriage Act

Source: United States Senator for Commonwealth of Virginia Mark R Warner

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine released the following statement on President Biden’s signing of the Respect for Marriage Act, legislation which will ensure that same-sex and interracial marriages are recognized by every state:

“We’re proud that Congress has passed and the President has signed the Respect for Marriage Act to ensure all Americans have their marriages recognized across the country. We saw this summer in the Dobbs decision that the Supreme Court is willing to throw out decades of precedent on equal protection and threaten important decisions like Obergefell. We’re glad that we could pass this bill to give same-sex and interracial couples the certainty they deserve that their marriages will be respected no matter what the Court does in the future. Now, it’s time to repeal the shameful ban on same-sex marriages that is still in Virginia’s constitution.”

Virginia passed a ban on same-sex marriage in 2006, which remains in the Virginia Constitution today. The Obergefell decision, which is currently the law of the land, overrides Virginia’s ban. However, if the Supreme Court overturns Obergefell, the right of LGBTQ Virginians to marry in the Commonwealth would be jeopardized unless that ban is repealed.

In the U.S. Senate, Warner and Kaine were among the 212 members of Congress who signed an amicus brief arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court that same-sex married couples should have the same legal security, rights, and responsibilities that federal law provides all other married couples. Warner and Kaine are also cosponsors of the Equality Act, which would amend federal civil rights laws to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in education, employment, housing, credit, and federal jury service.

See the full text of the Respect for Marriage Act here.

###

Thune Discusses His Broadband Oversight Effort, Presses Agencies to Cut Bureaucratic Red Tape for Broadband Infrastructure

Source: United States Senator for South Dakota John Thune

Click here to watch the video.
WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), ranking member of the Subcommittee on Communications, Media, and Broadband, today helped lead a subcommittee hearing entitled, “Ensuring Solutions to Meet America’s Broadband Needs.” During the hearing, Thune discussed his nationwide broadband oversight effort that will hold agencies accountable and ensure that previously authorized broadband funding is being used in the most efficient way possible to protect taxpayer dollars. Thune also highlighted his bipartisan Rural Internet Improvement Act, legislation that would streamline and bolster U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development broadband programs and ensure that their funding is being targeted to rural areas that need it the most.
As part of Thune’s broadband oversight effort, today he sent letters to the Department of Defense (DOD), Department of the Interior (DOI), Department of Transportation (DOT), and USDA regarding each of the agencies’ implementation of Thune’s MOBILE NOW Act that was signed into law in 2018, which, among other things, helped cut through the bureaucratic red tape associated with building broadband networks.
Full letter to DOD here. 
Full letter to DOI here.
Full letter to DOT here.
Full letter to USDA here.
Thune recently sent a letter to U.S. Department of Commerce Inspector General Peggy Gustafson for her failure to fulfill congressionally mandated oversight of previously authorized broadband funding. Thune also sent a letter to a diverse group of stakeholders, including broadband associations, public interest groups, and free-market think tanks to seek their input on the current broadband regulatory structure.
Thune’s opening remarks (as prepared for delivery):
“Thank you, Chairman Lujan for holding today’s hearing.
 
“I’d like to begin by saying it’s a been a pleasure to lead this subcommittee with you these past couple of years, and I look forward to continue working with you on a number of important issues before this subcommittee next Congress.
 
“One of those issues is ensuring Americans have access to reliable broadband services.
 
“The expansion of these services to more rural areas has long been a priority of mine here in the Senate.
 
“And since March of 2020, Congress has allocated billions of dollars for broadband-related services through COVID-19 pandemic relief packages, and most recently through passage of the infrastructure bill which provided broadband funding at a price tag of over $64 billion.
 
“The nearly $80 billion for broadband specific projects, on top of the billions of dollars the FCC disburses annually under its Universal Service Fund, is an unprecedented amount of money.
 
“The good news is that for those areas where certain connectivity challenges remain unresolved, this funding, in addition to the sustained investments made by telecommunications providers across the country, should help close the digital divide.
 
“The bad news is that this funding is spread out over 15 separate agencies and 133 programs with the lion’s share of the funding going through NTIA.
 
“This is deeply concerning.
 
“As I argued when Congress was debating the infrastructure bill, NTIA has previously fumbled attempts to bring broadband access to more communities.
 
“Back in 2009, the stimulus bill allocated $4.7 billion to NTIA to expand broadband access in rural and unserved areas.
 
“It didn’t go very well.
 
“The agency struggled with implementation and there were serious issues with a number of the projects the agency approved.
 
“Other projects resulted in a significant amount of overbuilding – meaning that they resulted in the construction of additional broadband infrastructure in areas that already had access to reliable broadband at the taxpayer’s expense.
 
“More recently, last year NTIA called for volunteers to help determine how to allocate the $1.5 billion Congress provided NTIA for certain broadband programs.
 
“That is unacceptable.
 
“And I’m afraid without stringent oversight, NTIA will make, and has already made, the same mistakes when managing the $42.5 billion Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment program and Tribal Broadband Connectivity program.
 
“That is why last week, I began an oversight effort to review the numerous federal broadband programs.
 
“Oversight of how these dollars are being spent is necessary to avoid agencies misusing billions of taxpayer dollars and more importantly, to ensure the funding is actually going to areas that are truly unserved.
 
“If there are changes that need to be made to the various programs Congress has established, we need to get to work to make sure they are as effective as possible and work as Congress intended.
 
“One such program we’ve begun work to make necessary improvements to is USDA’s ReConnect Program.
 
“I was pleased to partner with Chair Lujan and Senators Klobuchar and Fischer in introducing the Rural Internet Improvement Act—legislation that will streamline USDA’s broadband authorities and target funding to areas most in need.
 
“We must also recognize the federal government will not solve the digital divide on its own.
 
“It’s important we maintain a regulatory framework that promotes investment and allows telecommunications companies to make the kind of choices that have resulted in strong networks.
 
“Unlike other countries, broadband providers in the United States were able to keep Americans connected when demands for fixed and mobile networks soared during the pandemic.
 
“This is largely because of the United States’ light-tough regulatory approach to broadband policy, which has incentivized the private sector to make network reliability, affordability, and resiliency a priority.
 
“Finally, we must tackle permitting hurdles that delay the buildout of broadband infrastructure.
 
“My MOBILE NOW Act, which was signed into law in 2018, has been an effective tool in moving the federal government in the right direction, but I continue to hear concerns about unnecessary delays and costs associated with broadband permitting.
 
“The agencies processing permitting requests need to be held accountable if they are not meeting deadlines.
 
“Which is why today I’m sending requests to several federal agencies on the steps they have taken to implement MOBILE NOW’s broadband siting mandates.
 
“For too long we’ve talked about bridging the digital divide.
 
“It’s time to actually do it.
 
“And the only way that happens is if this Committee actually utilizes its important oversight responsibilities to ensure the agencies under its jurisdiction make smart, targeted investments that use taxpayer dollars responsibly.
 
“Anything short of that will result in government waste leaving Americans still unconnected.
 
“I want to thank each of the witnesses for being here today, and I look forward to the discussion.
 
“Thank you, Mr. Chairman.”

Lankford Calls on State Department to Protect Human Rights, Address Countries of Particular Concern

Source: United States Senator for Oklahoma James Lankford

12.13.22

WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) sent a letter to the State Department after its annual release of Countries of Particular Concern, Special Watch List, and Entities of Particular Concern designations did not follow USCIRF’s recommendations, specific to India, Nigeria, and Afghanistan. Lankford is asking for the Department’s legally required explanation to Congress on its designations.

Lankford stated in the letter, “We have been encouraged by the long-standing commitment of many entities within the United States Government, particularly the Office of International Religious Freedom (IRF) at the Department of State and the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), to ensure that the right to have faith, live that faith, change faiths or have no faith is promoted and protected around the globe. It is vital that the United States continue to provide global leadership to advance this crucial element of the human rights framework.

“To accomplish this goal, we must first publicly highlight abuse, persecution and discrimination experienced by people and groups of faith around the world. It is impossible to solve a problem without awareness of its existence or scope. Congress recognized this vital responsibility when it enacted the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) more than two decades ago. In addition to establishing the IRF office and USCIRF, this law required that an annual report detailing the state of religious freedom in each foreign country, violations of religious freedom by foreign governments and actions and policies of the United States that support religious freedom be transmitted to Congress.”

“IRFA requires the President to fully consider the CPC recommendations of USCIRF when making CPC determinations. However, since the enactment of IRFA, CPC designations by the Secretary of State and USCIRF recommendations have not always aligned, and the reasons for the divergence have been unclear to Congress. As such, the Senate Appropriations Committee report accompanying the FY 2021 and FY 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Acts required the Department to provide the rationale for differences in CPC designations to the appropriate congressional committees within 30 days of such decision. To date, this report has yet to be provided to Congress…I write to you today to request the expeditious transmission of this report to the appropriate Congressional committees in light of a number of troubling omissions from the Department’s designations as compared to USCIRF’s recommendations and the factual religious freedom conditions reported by the Department.”

Lankford remains a leader in advancing religious liberty and human rights around the world. Lankford joined Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and their colleagues to introduce legislation to reauthorize the independent US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) through 2024. Lankford introduced legislation to reauthorize the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act. Lankford recently received the Hero on the Hill award from Jeff King, President of the International Christian Concern (ICC), for his work to bring to light the persecution of people of faith around the world and his work to advance religious freedom.

You can read the full letter HERE and below:

Dear Secretary Blinken,

Since our founding, the United States has boldly recognized the inherent right of freedom of religion for all faiths and declared that protection as a fundamental human right for all people everywhere. Unfortunately, for many people and groups of faith around the world, this inherent right seems unattainable, as governments continue to restrict, oppress, and punish the free exercise of religion.

Nevertheless, we have been encouraged by the long-standing commitment of many entities within the United States Government, particularly the Office of International Religious Freedom (IRF) at the Department of State and the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), to ensure that the right to have faith, live that faith, change faiths or have no faith is promoted and protected around the globe. It is vital that the United States continue to provide global leadership to advance this crucial element of the human rights framework.

To accomplish this goal, we must first publicly highlight abuse, persecution and discrimination experienced by people and groups of faith around the world. It is impossible to solve a problem without awareness of its existence or scope. Congress recognized this vital responsibility when it enacted the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) more than two decades ago. In addition to establishing the IRF office and USCIRF, this law required that an annual report detailing the state of religious freedom in each foreign country, violations of religious freedom by foreign governments and actions and policies of the United States that support religious freedom be transmitted to Congress.

IRFA requires the President to fully consider the CPC recommendations of USCIRF when making CPC determinations. However, since the enactment of IRFA, CPC designations by the Secretary of State and USCIRF recommendations have not always aligned, and the reasons for the divergence have been unclear to Congress. As such, the Senate Appropriations Committee report accompanying the FY 2021 and FY 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Acts required the Department to provide the rationale for differences in CPC designations to the appropriate congressional committees within 30 days of such decision. To date, this report has yet to be provided to Congress.

This report is a valuable assessment tool for Congress, particularly in light of recent instances of religious hostility and discrimination around the globe such as the brutal murder of Deborah Samuel Yakubu, China’s continued genocide of Uyghur Muslims and other minority groups, and Pakistan sentencing 16 individuals to death based on blasphemy charges. 

I write to you today to request the expeditious transmission of this report to the appropriate Congressional committees in light of a number of troubling omissions from the Department’s designations as compared to USCIRF’s recommendations and the factual religious freedom conditions reported by the Department.

I am extremely disappointed with the Department’s decision not to re-designate Nigeria as a CPC. USCIRF has recommended Nigeria be designated a CPC since 2009, and before that, inclusion on the Special Watch List (SWL) since 2002. While some violence may be attributable to ethnic divisions as well as religious tensions, the continued violence toward religious communities without sufficient response by the Nigerian government continues. As the Department referenced in its report, one Catholic Bishop said that conditions in Nigeria have “become a massive killing field, as both government and the governed look on helplessly.”[3]  Additionally, Nigeria aggressively enforces its blasphemy laws that run afoul of basic human rights. For example, Deborah Samuel Yakubu, a Christian college student, was violently stoned to death and then burned for comments she made about her faith on WhatsApp. This horrific story only demonstrates that religious freedom conditions in Nigeria are getting progressively worse. A strong condemnation from the United States Government, such as an official designation as a Country of Particular Concern, is warranted. I am expressly discouraged that the Department did not designate Nigeria as a CPC in light of the rampant and severe violations of religious freedom in the country.

Similarly, Afghanistan did not receive any formal designation, despite USCIRF’s repeated recommendation.  Among the many ramifications from the US withdrawal from Afghanistan is the fact that religious minorities are at increased risk under the Taliban regime, which was designated as an Entity of Particular Concern last year. As the Taliban now acts as the governing entity of Afghanistan, I am incredulous as to why the State Department chose not to update the designation of Afghanistan to reflect the Taliban’s hostility toward religious minorities and brutality toward people of faith. 

Additionally, India was not formally designated despite overt and repeated severe violations of religious freedom. India is an important security partner for the United States and a key counter-weight against China in the Indo-Pacific region. In the context of that partnership, the United States must have a robust discussion about the deteriorating religious freedom conditions for religious minorities in India. The purpose of any designation – whether it be CPC or SWL – is to shine a light on the most egregious religious freedom violators and promote continued engagement on the value of religious liberty at all levels of government. Formally designating countries under IRFA can be an effective diplomatic tool to encourage and secure changes in behavior. I welcome the Department’s explanation for why, in its view, a formal designation would not enhance our efforts to promote human rights in partner countries, such as India.

 

The United States must continue to be a leader in calling attention and responding to religious persecution wherever it occurs. But it is the responsibility of all nations to encourage these rights of freedom of religion, belief and conscience worldwide to ensure all people have the right to have a faith, live their faith, change their faith or have no faith at all. With this shared goal in mind, I eagerly await the Department’s legally-required report to Congress. 

 

In God We Trust,