Fischer Welcomes Investments in Grand Island and Kearney Airports

Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, today announced that Grand Island Central Regional Airport will receive $1.04 million and Kearney Regional Airport will receive $1.01 million. These investments from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill will go toward airport improvements. 

Senator Fischer voted for the bill, which passed Congress and was signed into law by the president.

“Nebraska’s airports keep our communities connected and allow for world-class Nebraska goods to be brought to market. I’m pleased to see million-dollar investments in the Grand Island and Kearney airports through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. With these resources the airports can make upgrades that will improve air travel in Central Nebraska,” said Senator Fischer. 

“Kearney Regional Airport is excited to receive additional funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure bill. This funding will be used for much needed airport improvement projects.  We appreciate Senator Fischer’s longstanding support for Nebraska airports,” said Jim Lynaugh, Airport Manager, Kearney Regional Airport.

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill made significant investments in airports across Nebraska, totaling approximately $2.9 billion over the next five years. A list of the breakdown of these initial investments by airport is below. 

Grand Island Central Regional Airport – $1,045,720

The Lincoln Airport – $1,754,998

Kearney Regional Airport – $1,013,815

North Platte Regional Airport – $1,010,453

Omaha Eppley Airfield – $7,275,037

Western Nebraska Regional Airport – $1,011,482

###

Fischer Welcomes $1.75 Million Investment in Lincoln Airport

Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), a member of the Senate Commerce Committee, today announced that the Lincoln Airport will receive $1.75 million for airport improvements through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. U.S. Senator Deb Fischer voted for the bill, which passed Congress and was signed into law by the president.

“Our state’s airports keep Nebraska communities connected and enable people to bring their world-class products to markets. This $1.75 million investment in the Lincoln Airport was made possible through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. It will allow for much-needed updates that will make travel easier and more reliable,” said Senator Fischer.

“Even in the best of times, the ability of the Lincoln Airport to meet all of its long-term infrastructure demands is challenging.  The destabilization of the aviation industry and its resultant impact on the consistency of revenue streams has amplified this challenge.  The efforts of Senator Fischer and all of our congressional delegation to secure critical infrastructure funding for Airports will allow us to step up our efforts in catching up on a backlog of possible critical projects in the areas of snow removal operations, general aviation growth and flood mitigation, among others.  We sincerely appreciate the assistance and look forward to working together towards a full economic recovery,” said David Haring, AAE., Executive Director of The Lincoln Airport. 

The total amount of funding going to the Lincoln Airport is $1,754,998. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill made significant investments in airports across Nebraska, totaling approximately $2.9 billion over the next five years. A list of the breakdown of these initial investments by airport is below.

Grand Island Central Regional Airport – $1,045,720

Kearney Regional Airport – $1,013,815

North Platte Regional Airport – $1,010,453

Omaha Eppley Airfield – $7,275,037

Western Nebraska Regional Airport – $1,011,482

###

Whitehouse & Cornyn Applaud New Bureau of Prisons Rule Adopting Their Input on First Step Act Anti-recidivism Measure

Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Sheldon Whitehouse

01.14.22

Senators’ bipartisan reforms poised to help Americans successfully transition back to society

Washington, DC – Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and John Cornyn (R-TX) applauded the federal Bureau of Prisons’ final rule implementing the prison reform measures of the senators’ landmark criminal justice reform bill, the First Step Act. Whitehouse and Cornyn authored First Step provisions establishing recidivism reduction programs to allow qualifying inmates to receive reductions to their sentences through time credits. After the Bureau’s initial draft rule failed to carry out those provisions fully, Whitehouse and Cornyn submitted an official comment calling for several improvements, which the Bureau incorporated into the final draft. Whitehouse and Cornyn issued the following joint statement on the final rule:

“For years, we have worked across the aisle on a core component of the First Step Act. Our provisions will reduce the rate of re-offense by connecting people to substance use and mental health treatment, job training, and other programs. The Bureau of Prisons’ first proposal for implementing these reforms fell short of the aims and urgency of our legislation, so we counseled the Bureau to revise its proposal. We’re glad our recommendations are part of the final rule, and gratified to know our bipartisan bill is improving the federal corrections system.”

In their January 2021 comment to the Bureau, the senators raised a number of concerns with the proposed rule, including that it:

  • Failed to give individuals credit for programs they completed after the First Step Act became law in late 2018;
  • Prevented inmates in residential reentry facilities from benefiting from the credits program; and
  • Proposed a needlessly narrow definition of the “days” needed to receive credit for anti-recidivism programming.

The Bureau’s final rule addresses each of the concerns raised in Whitehouse and Cornyn’s 2021 comment.

Cassidy: A Bridge is Coming to a River Near You

Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

01.14.22

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) released a statement following the announcement that the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) plans to provide $26.5 billion to states to repair bridges and infrastructure through the Bridge Formula Program. This funding was made possible by Cassidy’s bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that passed last year. Louisiana will receive approximately $1 billion over five years, including $202.6 million this fiscal year.

“Our bridges have been in desperate need of repair for decades. Today we take a giant step to secure the future of Louisiana infrastructure. When we listen to the needs of our state, we can deliver results that benefit all. Thanks to the bipartisan infrastructure bill, a bridge is coming to a river near you,” said Dr. Cassidy. 

According to the Governor’s office, some of the bridge projects that will advance this year due to this funding include:

  • LA 531 over I-20 Bridge Replacement in Webster Parish
  • I-10 over US & Missouri Pacific RR in Calcasieu and Jefferson Davis Parishes
  • Jimmie Davis Bridge Replacement in Caddo Parish
  • US90Z – Harvey Canal Tunnel Rehabilitation in Jefferson Parish
  • I-10 Sabine River Bridges Rehabilitation in Calcasieu Parish
  • I-20 Orange Street Overpass Repair in Ouachita Parish
  • US 61 Jefferson Highway Overpass Repair in East Baton Rouge Parish
  • LA 47 Intracoastal Waterway Gulf Outlet Bridge Rehabilitation in Orleans Parish
  • LA 485 Bridges near Allen Louisiana (Natchitoches Parish)
  • LA 835 Creek Bridges in Morehouse Parish
  • LA 121 over the Calcasieu River in Rapides Parish
  • LA 182 over Berwick Bay Bridge Rehabilitation in St. Mary Parish
  • US 51 over the Yellow Water River in Tangipahoa Parish
  • LA 1183 over Turner Canal in Avoyelles Parish
  • LA 1226 over Bayou Chevreuille in Natchitoches Parish
  • LA 961 over Sandy Creek in East Feliciana Parish
  • LA 404 Bayou and Canal Bridges in Iberville Parish

###



Cassidy: Parents Who Care About Their Children’s Education are Not “Domestic Terrorists”

Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

01.14.22

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), and 24 Republican colleagues today demanded answers from the U.S. Department of Education on reports that it played a role in creating a letter from the National School Board Association (NSBA) calling concerned parents “domestic terrorists.”

“Parents are not ‘domestic terrorists’ and it is appalling that anyone would suggest that exercising the constitutionally protected freedoms of speech and assembly would be characterized as a threat,” wrote the senators. “Parents across the country are outraged that their children’s education has been disrupted, delayed, even denied over the past two years.”

“News reports indicate that the letter from the NSBA to President Biden was actually initiated at your request,” continued the senators. “Accountability begins at the top, and as U.S. Secretary of Education you must explain your role, or your staff’s role, in the creation of this letter.”

Cassidy and Scott were joined by Senators Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Richard Burr (R-NC), John Thune (R-SD), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Mike Braun (R-IN), Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Jerry Moran (R-KS), James Lankford (R-OK), Tom Cotton (R-AR), Ron Johnson (R-WI), John Boozman (R-AR), John Barrasso (R-WY), Susan Collins (R-ME), Rick Scott (R-FL), John Cornyn (R-TX), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Ben Sasse (R-NE), Mike Lee (R-UT), and John Hoeven (R-ND).

Background

On September 29, 2021, NSBA sent a letter to President Biden accusing parents expressing concern and frustration with lockdowns, shutdowns, school closures, mandates and more of “domestic terrorism.” On October 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo directing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to act in response to the NSBA letter. Later that month, NSBA apologized for the language used in the letter after backlash from state school board associations. New reporting earlier this week revealed emails indicating Education Department Secretary Miguel Cardona solicited the letter from NSBA.

Read the full letter here or below.

Dear Secretary Cardona:

Parents are not “domestic terrorists” and it is appalling that anyone would suggest that exercising the constitutionally protected freedoms of speech and assembly would be characterized as a threat. Parents across the country are outraged that their children’s education has been disrupted, delayed, even denied over the past two years.

Study after study shows how much educational harm has been done to schoolchildren with shutdowns and closures. It is estimated most students lost between 30 and 50 percent of their learning gains because of school closures. Moreover, minority and low-income students and students with disabilities were among the hardest hit as a result of these disruptions, with many losing as much as a full year of educational progress. Students’ mental health suffered as well. According to the CDC, teen suicide attempts among girls increased by 51 percent, likely due in part to students’ inability to access in-person learning.

Yet on September 29, 2021, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to President Biden accusing parents expressing concern and frustration with lockdowns, shutdowns, school closures, mandates and more with “domestic terrorism.” The letter even suggested using the PATRIOT Act against parents who are concerned about months and years of lost educational opportunities due to school closures, shutdowns, and unnecessary restrictions.

On October 4, 2021, Attorney General Garland issued a memo at NSBA’s behest, directing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to act on the contents of the NSBA letter. That evoked the prospects of the FBI using the powers of the PATRIOT Act against peacefully protesting parents frantic to get their children back in school so they don’t fall behind and lose a year of education.

On October 22, 2021, the NSBA apologized for the letter, as they should. Many state school board associations have called into question their affiliation with the NSBA, and the NSBA has a lot of work to do to regain the trust of America’s moms and dads without significant reforms.

Unfortunately, the Attorney General has not rescinded his memo, as he should.

While we knew early on that White House staff were complicit in the creation of this letter, it is only recently that information has surfaced implicating you and your office in this shameful episode. News reports indicate that the letter from the NSBA to President Biden was actually initiated at your request.

Accountability begins at the top, and as U.S. Secretary of Education you must explain your role, or your staff’s role, in the creation of this letter.

Please respond to the following questions by 4:00 p.m., Friday, January 14, 2022:

  1. What role did you personally play in soliciting the letter from the NSBA to the President on September 29, 2021? Did you advise on the content or the wording of the letter?
  2. What role did your staff play in soliciting the letter from the NSBA to the President on September 29, 2021? Did they advise on the content or the wording of the letter?
  3. Do you believe that parents exercising constitutionally protected rights are “domestic terrorists”?
  4. What direction was your Department given from the White House regarding the origination, creation, or content of the letter?
  5. Will you commit to firing any staff involved in crafting this letter if they did so without your knowledge or direction?
  6. Do you think that school board meetings should be open to the public to allow parents to have oversight and influence on their children’s education?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

###

Murkowski Votes to Sanction Nord Stream 2

Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski

01.14.22

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) yesterday voted in favor of S. 3436, the Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Implementation Act, which would impose sanctions with respect to entities responsible for the planning, construction, or operation of the Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline. The vote, set at a threshold of 60 for passage, failed by a margin of 55-44.

“Our partners in Europe need better options to meet their energy demand, but increasing their dependence on Russian gas is not one of them. Especially with Russian troops massed on the Ukrainian border, with an invasion possible at any time, we cannot allow Russia to consolidate its control over Europe’s energy security and further weaken Ukraine’s status as a key transit state,” said Senator Murkowski. “The Biden administration’s decision to waive sanctions on Nord Stream 2 was a mistake that is allowing Russia to increase its malign influence in the region, including its ability to manipulate prices and supply. We need stronger action than we’ve seen from this White House, and this legislation is a way to require it.”

Background:

The Nord Stream 2 pipeline would double the capacity of the existing Nord Stream system, which runs from Russia to Germany, and deliver an additional 55 billion cubic meters of gas each year. In 2020, Russia accounted for 48 percent of Europe’s natural gas imports.

Last year, the Biden administration chose to waive sanctions on the company behind the project – Nord Stream 2 AG – despite a mandatory obligation to impose them. Senate Republicans and Democrats alike have strongly objected to the Biden administration’s failure to use their mandatory sanction authorities against the project, which is now nearly complete.

Related Issues: Defense


Murkowski Welcomes Supreme Court Decision Blocking Biden’s Vaccine Sweeping Mandate for Businesses

Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski

01.13.22

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) issued the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Biden administration from enforcing its vaccine and testing mandate for private companies with more than 100 employees. In a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled against the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) order for larger businesses to either require vaccines or have a masking and testing policy.

“I join many Alaskans in welcoming the Supreme Court decision to uphold the stay on OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) today. From the start, I have questioned the constitutionality of the Biden administration’s mandate that employers with more than 100 employees require that their employees are vaccinated against COVID-19 or submit to regular testing and mask wearing. Not only is it an overreach by the federal government, but Alaskan employers continue to tell me that the mandate would have tremendous negative impacts on our workforce and economy. In the midst of severe testing and workforce shortages and businesses struggling to stay open, Alaskan employers should not also have to deal with a federal mandate which could make the labor shortage even more acute. Nor should employees be forced to choose between a vaccine they don’t want, inaccessible and, time consuming testing, or losing their jobs,” said Senator Murkowski. “While I am fully vaccinated and encourage others to do the same, the federal government does not have the authority to mandate vaccinations through this ETS.  I’m glad that the Supreme Court recognized that the U.S. Senate spoke loud and clear on this and came to the same conclusion—that OSHA exceeded its authority in enacting the mandate.”

Background:

  • On September 8, President Joe Biden announced he was directing federal agencies to move forward on vaccine mandates for private sector workers and federal workers and contractors.
  • On November 4, OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) mandating that private employers with at least 100 employees ensure that their employees are vaccinated against COVID-19 or are tested weekly and wear masks when working near other employees indoors.
  • On November 17, Senator Murkowski joined her Senate Republican colleagues in introducing a joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the OSHA ETS rule.
  • On December 8, Senator Murkowski voted to overturn the vaccine and testing mandate by voting for that joint resolution, which passed the Senate by a vote of 52 to 48.
  • On January 3, Senator Murkowski joined a bicameral amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court supporting a stay of agency action on the OSHA rule until the case is resolved.

 

Related Issues: Health


Boozman, Cotton Demand Answers from Education Secretary on Scheme to Label Parents “Domestic Terrorists”

Source: United States Senator for Arkansas – John Boozman

WASHINGTON–U.S. Senators John Boozman (R-AR) and Tom Cotton (R-AR) are demanding answers from U.S. Department of Education Secretary Miguel Cardona on reports that he played a key role in orchestrating a letter from the National School Board Association (NSBA) that called concerned parents “domestic terrorists.” 

The Arkansas senators joined Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) and several of their GOP colleagues questioning the secretary’s involvement in the September 2021 letter that led to a controversial memo issued by Attorney General Merrick Garland suggesting federal law enforcement may be needed to police local school board meetings. 

“Parents are not ‘domestic terrorists’ and it is appalling that anyone would suggest that exercising the constitutionally protected freedoms of speech and assembly would be characterized as a threat,” wrote the senators. “Parents across the country are outraged that their children’s education has been disrupted, delayed, even denied over the past two years.”

“While we knew early on that White House staff were complicit in the creation of this letter, it is only recently that information has surfaced implicating you and your office in this shameful episode,” the senators continued. “News reports indicate that the letter from the NSBA to President Biden was actually initiated at your request. Accountability begins at the top, and as U.S. Secretary of Education you must explain your role, or your staff’s role, in the creation of this letter.” 

BACKGROUND 

  • On September 29, 2021, the NSBA sent a letter to President Biden accusing parents expressing concern and frustration with lockdowns, shutdowns, school closures, mandates and more of “domestic terrorism.” 
  • In response, on October 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memo directing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to act on the contents of the NSBA letter.
  • On October 22, 2021, the NSBA apologized for the letter after receiving significant backlash from state school board associations.
  • This week, new reporting revealed emails indicating the NSBA letter was sent to the Biden administration at the request of Secretary Cardona.

Full text of the senators’ letter to Sec. Cardona is available here and below.  

Dear Secretary Cardona: 

Parents are not “domestic terrorists” and it is appalling that anyone would suggest that exercising the constitutionally protected freedoms of speech and assembly would be characterized as a threat. Parents across the country are outraged that their children’s education has been disrupted, delayed, even denied over the past two years. 

Study after study shows how much educational harm has been done to schoolchildren with shutdowns and closures. It is estimated most students lost between 30 and 50 percent of their learning gains because of school closures. Moreover, minority and low-income students and students with disabilities were among the hardest hit as a result of these disruptions, with many losing as much as a full year of educational progress. Students’ mental health suffered as well. According to the CDC, teen suicide attempts among girls increased by 51 percent, likely due in part to students’ inability to access in-person learning. 

Yet on September 29, 2021, the National School Boards Association (NSBA) sent a letter to President Biden accusing parents expressing concern and frustration with lockdowns, shutdowns, school closures, mandates and more with “domestic terrorism.” The letter even suggested using the PATRIOT Act against parents who are concerned about months and years of lost educational opportunities due to school closures, shutdowns, and unnecessary restrictions.

On October 4, 2021, Attorney General Garland issued a memo at NSBA’s behest, directing the FBI and U.S. Attorneys to act on the contents of the NSBA letter. That evoked the prospects of the FBI using the powers of the PATRIOT Act against peacefully protesting parents frantic to get their children back in school so they don’t fall behind and lose a year of education.

On October 22, 2021, the NSBA apologized for the letter, as they should. Many state school board associations have called into question their affiliation with the NSBA, and the NSBA has a lot of work to do to regain the trust of America’s moms and dads without significant reforms.

Unfortunately, the Attorney General has not rescinded his memo, as he should.

While we knew early on that White House staff were complicit in the creation of this letter, it is only recently that information has surfaced implicating you and your office in this shameful episode. News reports indicate that the letter from the NSBA to President Biden was actually initiated at your request. 

Accountability begins at the top, and as U.S. Secretary of Education you must explain your role, or your staff’s role, in the creation of this letter.

Please respond to the following questions by 4:00 p.m., Friday, January 14, 2022:

  1. What role did you personally play in soliciting the letter from the NSBA to the President on September 29, 2021? Did you advise on the content or the wording of the letter?
  2. What role did your staff play in soliciting the letter from the NSBA to the President on September 29, 2021? Did they advise on the content or the wording of the letter?
  3. Do you believe that parents exercising constitutionally protected rights are “domestic terrorists”?
  4. What direction was your Department given from the White House regarding the origination, creation, or content of the letter?
  5. Will you commit to firing any staff involved in crafting this letter if they did so without your knowledge or direction?
  6. Do you think that school board meetings should be open to the public to allow parents to have oversight and influence on their children’s education?

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

With Inflation At 40-Year High, Ernst Backs Effort to Combat Egregious Spending

Source: United States Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA)

WASHINGTON—With inflation at its highest rate in 40 years, U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is backing an effort to combat Washington’s egregious spending. Ernst is supporting the Inflation Prevention Act to prevent government spending that would increase inflation until the year-over-year inflation rate drops below 4.5 percent.
 
“President Biden’s policies continue to cause soaring inflation–the highest in forty years–pinching the pocketbooks of hardworking Iowans and making it harder for them to purchase everyday household items from groceries to gasoline. We must rein in the Democrats’ out of control spending, and this effort will take steps to ensure spendthrift lawmakers are held accountable for the impact their actions have on everyday Americans,” said Senator Ernst.
 
This bill has also garnered support from several organizations including the National Taxpayers Union, Heritage Action, Americans for Tax Reform, FreedomWorks, and the Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC).
 
Background:

 
Ernst also helped introduce an amendment to the Senate Rules to require all bills passed by Senate committees to include inflationary impact statements, so Americans can see the true impacts of government spending.
 
###

Lankford, Scott, Colleagues Want to Stop Congress from Overspending When Inflation Soars

Source: United States Senator for Oklahoma James Lankford

01.14.22

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) joined Senators Tim Scott (R-SC) and John Thune (R-SD), and eight of their colleagues to introduce the Inflation Prevention Act (IPA) to help combat inflationary spending. Due to record government spending over the last two years, many Americans face rapidly rising costs of consumer goods. This bill would bar legislation estimated to increase inflation until the year-over-year inflation rate drops below 4.5 percent. Lankford, Scott, and Thune are joined on the bill by Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Rick Scott (R-FL), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Todd Young (R-IN), Marco Rubio (R-FL), John Hoeven (R-ND), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Steve Daines (R-MT).

“It’s clear that Democrats’ reckless spending approach to the pandemic has created the inflation crisis Oklahomans now face, especially after inflation hit a devastating 7 percent in December,” said Lankford. “I have warned about the impact of out-of-control spending on our economy for years. Our proposal protects against federal over spending that makes inflation worse, helps make sure future emergency spending only moves forward when absolutely needed, and reins it in when the federal pork barrel buffet starts to roll toward inflation.”

“American families cannot continue to endure the burden of skyrocketing costs of everyday goods brought on by reckless spending in Washington,” said Tim Scott. “A sound financial future requires wise financial action now.”

“Our country is facing the highest level of inflation in nearly 40 years, and South Dakotans are paying more for food, utilities, and gas,” said Thune. “I’m proud to join Sen. Scott in the fight to stop the Democrats’ reckless tax-and-spending spree, which would significantly worsen the already damaging inflation crisis.”

“From gas to groceries, Iowans and all Americans are paying higher prices because of record inflation stoked by irresponsible government spending. Our bill seeks to prevent Congress from pouring even more gasoline on the fires of inflation by restricting the ability of Congress to approve new spending while inflation remains historically high,” said Grassley.

“Families are worried about the skyrocketing inflation our country is experiencing. We know that reckless government spending causes inflation, but President Biden and the Democrats have absolutely no plans to slow down spending or get our debt under control. It’s shameful. Congress needs to get real about the true cost on every American family that this wasteful spending brings and start acting responsibly. That’s why we must pass the Inflation Prevention Act. I look forward to my colleagues supporting this measure to stop reckless spending and getting our country back on the path to prosperity,” said Rick Scott.

“President Biden’s policies continue to cause soaring inflation–the highest in forty years–pinching the pocketbooks of hardworking Iowans and making it harder for them to purchase everyday household items from groceries to gasoline. We must reign in the Democrats’ out of control spending, and this effort will take steps to ensure spendthrift lawmakers are held accountable for the impact their action have on everyday Americans,” said Ernst.

“Under the Biden inflation crisis, inflation is at a 40-year high and working Americans are struggling to pay for the daily essentials. For months, Democrats have ignored the problem, blaming everything instead of their socialist spending agenda. The Inflation Prevention Act would ensure that the bills we are voting on in Congress do not make this problem worse,” said Young.

“Everyday Americans could care less about a lot of the issues we have been discussing lately in the Senate,” said Rubio. “What people are really worried about is the fact that it costs more to feed their families and put gas in their cars. People can’t get basic goods because grocery store shelves are empty. And rather than fixing the problem, the Biden Administration and Democrats in Congress are making things worse. This bill puts a few commonsense guardrails in place to curb reckless spending habits in Congress that threaten to create even more challenges for American families. That’s the kind of action we should be taking right now.”

“Inflation is a tax on all Americans and it is now the highest rate it has been in 40 years,” said Hoeven. “The Inflation Prevention Act will prohibit legislation that worsens inflation. Prices are continuing to rise, and our bill will help prevent further harm to American consumers.”

This bill is supported by the National Taxpayers Union, Heritage Action, Americans for Tax Reform, FreedomWorks, and the Conservative Political Action Coalition (CPAC).

###