Rubio, Colleagues Introduce Bill to Beautify Federal Architecture

Source: United States Senator for Florida Marco Rubio

America’s founders intended for Washington, D.C. to be a classical capital city. Most Americans also prefer traditional building designs over modernist ones. However, since the 1950s, federal buildings have been constructed with modern architecture counter to both the founders’ vision and the public’s preference.

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and colleagues introduced the Beautifying Federal Civil Architecture Act to make classical and traditional architecture the preferred architectural style for certain federal public buildings.

  • “Federal buildings physically embody our system of government and its institutions. Federal buildings should therefore reflect our government’s dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability while inspiring civic pride. I am proud to introduce the Beautifying Federal Civil Architecture Act to restore the tradition and beauty that our nation’s federal architecture has lost.” – Senator Rubio

Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mike Braun (R-IN), Ted Budd (R-NC), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Mike Lee (R-UT) are original cosponsors.

  • “Washington, D.C. is home to a beautiful array of classical and traditional buildings with architecture that has stood the test of time. It’s time to right the ship when it comes to styling federal buildings, and have Congress declare what the Founding Fathers intended: that classical and traditional architecture should be the blueprint of all federal government buildings.” – Senator Braun 

U.S. Representative Jim Banks (R-IN) introduced companion legislation in the House.

This bill is endorsed by the National Civic Art Society.

  • “The National Civic Art Society strongly supports the Beautifying Federal Civic Architecture Act. It is crucial that the design of federal buildings reflects the preferences of ordinary Americans–namely, that such buildings be beautiful, uplifting, and designed in a classical or traditional style. Whereas the current government process for choosing building designs involves zero input from the community, this legislation democratizes design by requiring that there be substantial input from the general public. We applaud Senator Rubio for his leadership on this important issue.” – Justin Shubow, President of the National Civic Art Society and former Chairman of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts. 

Following Rosen Call for Action, Administration Extends Temporary Protected Status Designation for El Salvador and Honduras

Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

In A Recent Letter, Senator Rosen Had Called On Administration To Extend TPS Protections For Immigrants From El Salvador And Honduras

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) applauded news that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will extend Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation for El Salvador and Honduras following a push from Senator Rosen and colleagues. Over 400,000 people with TPS live in communities across the United States — where they fill essential jobs in local economies and contribute billions of dollars every year in taxes. Nevada is home to over 6,000 TPS recipients, most of whom are from El Salvador or Honduras.

“TPS recipients came to the United States seeking safety and fleeing dangerous situations, which is why I called for an extension of the TPS designation for El Salvador and Honduras,” said Senator Rosen. “I’m glad the Administration listened and extended these protections, giving TPS recipients and their families peace of mind. While this is a positive step forward, we must continue working to pass comprehensive immigration reform.”

The TPS for both El Salvador and Honduras was originally jeopardized because of actions by the Trump administration that Senator Rosen strongly opposed. Redesignating El Salvador and Honduras for TPS ensures that current TPS recipients and those eligible for TPS from these countries receive needed protection.

###

Rosen, Cortez Masto Announce Nearly $12 Million for Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe to Construct “Indian Route 35”

Source: United States Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV)

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senators Jacky Rosen (D-NV) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) announced $11,975,000 in funding for the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe to build “Indian Route 35,” also known as Wadsworth Bypass Road, through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Nationally Significant Federal Lands and Tribal Projects (NSFLTP) program. This road will help create a means for through-traffic to bypass Wadsworth, Nevada, and provide a safer and more efficient route for everyone.

“I’m proud to announce that the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that I helped write and pass is continuing to deliver for Nevadans by connecting our state,” said Senator Rosen. “This new funding will build a new road to better connect the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe with communities in northern Nevada.”

“Building ‘Indian Route 35’ will make a big difference for the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe by improving safety and reducing traffic congestion in a critical corridor in Tribal territory,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “I will always work to make sure Native communities in Nevada get the federal support they need, and I will continue working to bring in resources to rebuild our roads and bridges and create more good-paying jobs in Nevada.”

The Wadsworth Bypass Road is a singular, continuous federally-owned Tribal transportation facility proposed as a two-lane 2.91 mile long rural road with grading and drainage, asphalt pavement, and intersection improvements. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that Senators Rosen and Cortez Masto championed required at least 50 percent of federal program funding go toward Tribal transportation projects, and it increased the Federal share for Tribal transportation projects to 100 percent.

Senators Rosen and Cortez Masto have been strong advocates on behalf of Tribes in Nevada and across the country. Senator Rosen has consistently advocated for robust federal funding to benefit tribal families and children in Nevada. In the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law that they both helped pass, Senator Rosen helped write the bill’s broadband section and ensured communities across Nevada would receive the resources to increase access to high-speed internet. Senators Rosen and Cortez Masto recently sent a letter urging the Biden Administration to support a national monument designation at Bahsahwahbee, which holds sacred and spiritual significance for several Tribes.  

###

Fischer, Ricketts, Smith Letter on Swanson & Red Willow Reservoirs

Source: United States Senator for Nebraska Deb Fischer

Notes BoR’s Poor Communication, Outlines Actions Needed to Remedy Situation

U.S. Senators Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) and Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.), as well as U.S. Representative Adrian Smith (NE-03), sent a letter to the Hitchcock and Red Willow County Commissioners about the Swanson and Red Willow reservoirs. The letter was also shared with the concessionaires at the reservoirs.

In the letter, the three members outline their shared frustration with the Bureau of Reclamation’s (BoR) handling of the concession areas at the Swanson and Red Willow Reservoirs. The group then notes what steps would need to be taken at the local level to begin the process of introducing land transfer legislation at the federal level. 

“We appreciate receiving your comments and share your frustration with the BoR’s management of the reservoirs’ future. Given the impacts to numerous Nebraskans and multiple communities, it is critical there is clarity on what courses of action can be taken at the federal level and what role a local entity would need to play to remedy the situation,” said the Members.

“In order to pursue land transfer legislation, a local entity – such as the NGPC, a county, or other types of entities listed above – would need to provide our offices with official documentation that they are willing to accept the land, are capable of managing it for the public, and will take on the associated responsibilities and liabilities.

“We share your concerns with how the BoR has managed the situation and want to support the families of the Swanson and Red Willow communities. We stand ready to sponsor legislation to authorize a land transfer but cannot do so without a willing and capable public entity,” the Members continued. 

Full text of the letter can be found below:

Thank you for contacting us about Bureau of Reclamation (BoR) Swanson and Red Willow Reservoirs. We appreciate receiving your comments and share your frustration with the BoR’s management of the reservoirs’ future. Given the impacts to numerous Nebraskans and multiple communities, it is critical there is clarity on what courses of action can be taken at the federal level and what role a local entity would need to play to remedy the situation.

As you know, in the master lease agreement signed in April of 2022, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (NGPC) and BoR decided to have BoR directly manage the concession areas at the Swanson and Red Willow Reservoirs, removing NGPC from the day-to-day management process. Since BoR has taken over direct management of the concession areas, we have pushed BoR to create clear lines of communication with impacted parties. BoR has failed in this communication, as evidenced by failing to provide contracts and documents to concessionaires for review in a timely manner, and failing to be transparent about BoR’s plans for future development of the area.

We have received requests to introduce legislation to transfer ownership of the areas from BoR to a local stakeholder. When land transfer legislation has been successful in past Congresses, it has required a local public entity that is willing to take on the liability and responsibility of permanent management. Such a public entity could include a state recreation agency, a municipality, a water association or irrigation district, or a natural resources district. Additionally, the entity that receives the land traditionally has been either the current operator, or has had extensive experience operating the area (e.g. in the manner that NGPC previously managed these concession areas). These procedures have been followed to ensure the land can continue to be managed for the public interest.

In order to pursue land transfer legislation, a local entity – such as the NGPC, a county, or other types of entities listed above – would need to provide our offices with official documentation that they are willing to accept the land, are capable of managing it for the public, and will take on the associated responsibilities and liabilities.

Unless a local entity formally notifies the delegation they will accept the land, we cannot begin the lengthy federal legislative process. Land transfer legislation often takes years to succeed. The legislation would need to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed into law by the President. As we have relayed in the past, we stand ready to pursue this avenue; we are concerned, however, a delay in receiving official feedback from a ready and willing partner has shortened the window of opportunity for getting this done before Swanson and Red Willow residents are impacted by BoR actions.

We share your concerns with how the BoR has managed the situation and want to support the families of the Swanson and Red Willow communities. We stand ready to sponsor legislation to authorize a land transfer but cannot do so without a willing and capable public entity. 

Again, thank you for contacting us.

Links to each letter: 

Hitchcock County Commissioners

Red Willow County Commissioners

Concessionaires 

Hawley Demands Answers from Biden Energy Secretary for Misleading Congress About Holding Stocks

Source: United States Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo)

Today U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) sent a letter to Department of Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm demanding an explanation for misleading Senator Hawley during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing. During the April hearing, Secretary Granholm claimed she did not own any personal financial stocks, when in fact, she held individual stocks as recently as May of this year.

“I write in response to your letter dated June 9, 2023 to the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources admitting that you misled the committee and, in particular, misled me about your compliance with federal ethics laws and your conflicts of interest regarding stock holdings,” wrote Senator Hawley. “These alarming new revelations demand an immediate and complete explanation from you.”

He continued, “Three times you told me, and this committee, that you did not own individual stocks. But we now know that was false. Last Friday, you informed the committee that you did own stocks at the time of your testimony on April 20, 2023. In fact, you still held stocks in six companies. You then divested from these holdings on May 18, 2023. But you chose not to notify the committee until last Friday—over seven weeks after the hearing and at least three weeks after you sold these stocks. So I want to know: why?”

Read the full letter here or below.

June 13, 2023

The Honorable Jennifer Granholm
Secretary
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20585

Secretary Granholm:

I write in response to your letter dated June 9, 2023 to the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources admitting that you misled the committee and, in particular, misled me about your compliance with federal ethics laws and your conflicts of interest regarding stock holdings. These alarming new revelations demand an immediate and complete explanation from you.

As you know, in January 2022, news reports indicated that you violated federal conflict of interest laws by improperly disclosing stock sales. Then earlier this year, an investigation by the Wall Street Journal reported that “hundreds of Energy Department officials hold stocks related to agency’s work despite warnings.” When you testified before the Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources in April, I asked you point blank: “Do you own individual stocks?” You responded: “No, I’m invested in mutual funds.” When I pressed you about reports that you had violated stock disclosure laws nine times, you responded that you had missed a filing deadline for stocks that you had previously owned. I asked for clarity: “You don’t own any individual stock now, so maybe you did when you first came, and you converted them to mutual funds?” You responded: “Yea, it totally was the sale of what I had, because I’m not owning individual stocks.” Three times you told me, and this committee, that you did not own individual stocks.

But we now know that was false. Last Friday, you informed the committee that you did own stocks at the time of your testimony on April 20, 2023. In fact, you still held stocks in six companies. You then divested from these holdings on May 18, 2023. But you chose not to notify the committee until last Friday—over seven weeks after the hearing and at least three weeks after you sold these stocks. So I want to know: why?

So that Congress can consider further action concerning your compliance with federal ethics laws, please provide the following information by June 20, 2023.

  1. Why did you not immediately notify the committee to correct the record on your false testimony?
     
  2. Why did it take you four weeks to sell your remaining individual stocks?
     
  3. Why did it take you over three weeks to notify the committee of that sale?
     
  4. Why did you elect not to sell all of your individual stocks when you assumed office?

In addition, within 30 days, please provide the Committee and my office a complete list of all of your individual stock transactions over the past 10 years for an evaluation of any additional conflicts of interest. 

Sincerely,

Josh Hawley
United States Senator

Kennedy introduces resolution to reverse burdensome woke Biden CFPB rule

Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) today introduced a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) rule to implement Dodd Frank Section 1071, which amends the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).

Rep. Roger Williams (R-Texas) has introduced the resolution in the House of Representatives.

“By collecting and publishing personal demographic and other information, the CFPB is putting small business owners at risk of having their private financial affairs exposed to a watching world. Reporting these personal details is an invasion of privacy and a waste of resources aimed at furthering the woke agenda. The practical impact of this rule could hamstring lending to Main Street,” Kennedy said.

“The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) new rule is a continued attack on Main Street America. Each day, small businesses struggle with rising costs, increasing interest rates, and ongoing labor shortages, and this new rule only builds on those issues. We cannot allow the CFPB to continue to add burdensome requirements without any consideration of their impact on small businesses and lenders. I am proud to stand by my commitment to protect Main Street America from costly over-regulation by unelected bureaucrats,” said Williams.

Kennedy’s CRA would ensure that the CFPB’s final rule on Dodd-Frank Section 1071 does not go into effect. 

Background: 

On March 30, the CFPB promulgated the final rule implementing Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which amends the ECOA. The rule was published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2023.

Section 1071 requires covered financial institutions to collect and report certain personal information on small business loan applicants and report that to the CFPB. The CFPB may then make certain parts of that information public, including data that could publicly identify the small business credit applicant.

In order to comply with the Biden CFPB rule, financial institutions would have to collect information about applicants, including the applicant’s census tract, North American Industry Classification System and years in business, among other information. Further, banks are required to report the owner’s race, ethnicity and sex; and whether the business is minority-owned, women-owned or LGBT-owned.

  • The rule applies to financial institutions that originated at least 100 small business loans in each of the two preceding calendar years. 
  • Based on the number of credit transactions for small businesses, covered financial institutions must comply with the final rule beginning October 1, 2024; April 1, 2025; or January 1, 2026.
  • A small business is defined as a company with $5 million or less in revenue from the previous fiscal year.

Among the many concerns about the CFPB’s collecting and storing such personal information is that the agency recently experienced a data breach including the personally identifiable information of 256,000 consumers and failed to properly inform them for two months. 

The implementation of this rule may reduce the availability and accessibility of small business credit by increasing compliance costs of lenders.

Text of the resolution is here.

Kennedy to Biden admin’s CFPB: “Why do you want to know what a small business woman’s sexual preference is?”

Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)

Watch Kennedy’s exchange here.

WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Banking Committee, today questioned Rohit Chopra, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on its rule to implement Dodd Frank Section 1071. The Biden administration rule would require banks to collect data on small business owners when they seek a loan. 

Key excerpts from the exchange are below.

Kennedy: “Is your rule going to require banks to ask the customer about their race?”

Chopra: “So, that is in the statute—”

. . . 

Kennedy: “Your rule would require a bank to ask the question of a small business person, ‘What’s your race? What’s your ethnicity? What’s your sexual preference? Are you gay? Are you a woman?’

“Now, that’s—you can bubble-wrap this all you want, but that’s what your rule does.

“Now, the customer—particularly in a small town—is going to go, ‘Woah, what’s my sexual preference have to do with a loan?’

“And the customer can say, ‘I don’t want to answer,’ but then the bank has got—you’re requiring the bank to tell you that they wouldn’t answer, and all of this data is going to go to your agency, and, we don’t have the slightest idea how you’re going to use it, except you say you’re going to publish it.”

Chopra: “Well, we will not get any names at all . . . ”

Kennedy: “Yeah, but you’re going to have data sets, so that it’s possible—you can’t tell me it’s not possible to have this information known. Why do you want all this information?” 

Chopra: “I don’t—”

Kennedy: “Why do you want to know what a small business woman’s sexual preference is?”

Chopra: “Okay, that’s a mischaracterization of it.”

Kennedy: “No, it’s not.”

. . .

Kennedy: “Why do you want to know what a small business woman—let’s say in a town of 20,000 people, going to her local bank [to] borrow money—why do you want to know what her sexual preference is? What business is that of yours?”

Chopra: “We sought to implement what the congressional requirements are—” 

Kennedy: “What business is that of yours, what a small business woman does in her bedroom?” 

Chopra: “Again—”

Kennedy: “Who appointed you pope?”

Chopra: “Again, people are able to self-identify, if they wish.”

Kennedy: “You’re making them.”

Chopra: “We are not making them.”

Kennedy: “Yes, you are . . . and we have no idea how you’re going to use this information.”

Background:

  • Kennedy today introduced a Congressional Review Act resolution of disapproval to the CFPB rule to implement Dodd Frank Section 1071, which amends the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).
  • Kennedy introduced the Transparency in CFPB Cost-Benefit Analysis Act to ensure that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) does not establish regulations that would foist unreasonable costs or harms onto taxpayers, financial entities or consumers.
  • Kennedy introduced the Small LENDER Act to block the Biden administration’s CFPB from requiring community banks and lenders to collect and report social data—such as race, gender and ethnicity—from borrowers.

Watch the full exchange here.

Kennedy, Braun, Hassan introduce bipartisan bill to fix part of Medicare billing structure, saving billions

Source: United States Senator John Kennedy (Louisiana)

WASHINGTON – Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.) and Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) introduced a bipartisan bill to fix part of the Medicare billing structure that allows hospital systems to charge high hospital rates for care received at off-campus outpatient facilities.

Hospitals are gaming the system to charge Louisiana patients and taxpayers more for out-patient, off-site care. That’s wrong, and I’m proud to work with Sens. Braun and Hassan to make it right by correcting Medicare’s billing policy,” said Kennedy.

“Hoosiers know our health care system is broken, and one problem we can fix right now is services at off-campus outpatient facilities being billed to Medicare at higher hospital rates. Fixing this problem will save taxpayers 40 billion over the next decade, and this bill will apply some of those savings to fixing our nursing shortage by creating a new program to pay for training,” Braun said. 

“Granite Staters who have been going to the same doctor for years are experiencing sticker shock when a hospital acquires a doctor’s office or clinic and all of a sudden starts charging extra fees for the same services. Our bipartisan bill takes on the health care industry to eliminate unfair fees, lower costs for patients, and save taxpayer dollars—and then we use those savings to invest in the health care workforce. Lowering health care costs for Americans is a bipartisan priority, and I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support this commonsense bill,” said Hassan.

Due to Medicare’s billing structure, even if care is received at an off-campus outpatient facility, patients can receive bills that treat the care as if it was provided at a main hospital campus. This means the providers are charging patients and Medicare higher “hospital” rates when patients aren’t receiving in-patient care. 

The consequences of this artificial price hiking are expanding as hospitals acquire more and more small physician-owned practices and off-campus facilities. In 2020, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that, over the next decade, taxpayers will pay close to $40 billion in excess Medicare costs due to exorbitant facility fee payments.

 A provision in the 2015 Bipartisan Budget Act makes these price inflations possible because that law established “site-neutral” payments under Medicare for services received at off-campus outpatient departments, but it exempted most hospitals.

The SITE Act would end the 2015 Bipartisan Budget Act’s site-neutral exceptions. It would also prevent off-campus emergency departments from charging higher rates than on-campus emergency departments when standalone emergency facilities are located in close proximity to a hospital campus. 

The bill would require health systems to establish and bill using a unique National Provider Identifier number for every off-campus outpatient department. It would direct the Department of Health and Human Services to treat outpatient departments as subparts of the parent organization and to issue these subparts unique provider identifiers. The SITE Act would also remove liability for services rendered for payers who are not billed in accordance with this section’s requirements.

The bill would use a portion of the overall savings from this fix to help fill the nursing shortage by creating a graduate nursing education program that would provide payments for training costs. 

Text of the SITE Act is available here.

Duckworth Touts Key Priorities Included in Bipartisan FAA Reauthorization Act of 2023

Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

June 13, 2023

Duckworth successfully authored key provisions to help improve safety, expand the aviation workforce and enhance consumer protections for people with disabilities

[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (CST) and Chair of the Subcommittee on Aviation Safety, Operations and Innovation—today announced several of her key priorities were included in the bipartisan FAA Reauthorization Act of 2023. As one of the authors of the legislation, Duckworth successfully secured provisions that will improve safety for consumers, expand the aviation workforce and enhance protections for travelers with disabilities. If passed, the FAA reauthorization bill would extend FAA’s funding and authorities through the Fiscal Year 2028.

“The FAA Reauthorization Act is a win not only for our economy, but for aviation safety advocates and the flying public,” said Duckworth. “As Chair of the Subcommittee on Aviation Safety, Operations and Innovation, I’m so proud that this bill includes many of my priorities—including a modified version of the EVAC Act—to make flying safer and more accessible for all Americans. I’m grateful to my colleagues for working together to produce a strong, bipartisan bill that helps modernize the FAA, creates jobs, boosts the aviation workforce, increases consumer protections and makes sure people with disabilities are treated with the dignity and respect all Americans deserve.”

This reauthorization is the result of months-long bipartisan negotiations among the leadership of the Senate Commerce Committee between Chair Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Ranking Member Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Subcommittee leadership Chair Duckworth and Ranking Member Jerry Moran (R-KS).

Key priorities that Duckworth successfully included in the bill are listed below.

Increasing Aviation Workforce Development

The FAA Reauthorization Act includes a version the Duckworth-Moran bipartisan Aviation Workforce Development Enhancement and will triple annual funding levels for FAA Workforce Development Grants that support institutions that train pilots and aviation mechanics from $10 million to $30 million. It authorizes an additional $10 million per year for a new grant program that supports institutions that train aviation manufacturing workers, for a total annual authorization level of $40 million per year for aviation workforce development grants, which amounts to a five-year authorization level of $200 million.

After introducing their bipartisan bill in December 2022, Senators Duckworth and Moran (R-KS) worked with Senators Klobuchar (D-MN), Thune (R-SC), Kelly (D-AZ), Fischer (R-NE), Warnock (D-GA) and Capito (R-WV) to expand support for this program and craft the bipartisan Aviation Workforce Development Recruitment Act, which was included the Senate FAA reauthorization bill.

Improving Aviation Emergency Evacuation Standards

The modified version of the Duckworth-Baldwin EVAC Act in the FAA reauthorization bill would require modernization and improvements to aircraft evacuation standards by requiring the FAA to conduct a comprehensive study on aircraft evacuation and empanel a committee of experts and stakeholders—including representatives of the disability community, senior citizens and pediatricians—to evaluate gaps in current evacuations standards and operating procedures and make recommendations. Additionally, the FAA would be required to initiate a rulemaking on any recommendations the FAA Administrator deems appropriate. The FAA would also be required to report study findings, committee recommendations and the Administrator’s plan to implement any such recommendations.

The FAA study on evacuations would include:

  • Prospective risk analysis, not just evaluation of past incidents.
  • Recommendations for how to improve evacuation regulations and demonstrations to ensure they account for passengers with disabilities, including those who use wheelchairs or other mobility assistive devices.
  • Research on risk posed by carry-on bags recommended by NTSB.
  • Whether each new generation of aircraft should be required to undergo full-scale in-person evacuation testing.
  • An assessment of the following evacuation conditions:
  1. Presence of passengers of different ages, including infants, children and senior citizens;
  2. Presence of passengers with disabilities;
  3. Presence of passengers who have difficulty speaking or are non-verbal;
  4. Presence of passengers who do not speak English;
  5. Presence of carry-on luggage and personal items such as purse, briefcase or backpack
  6. Seat size and spacing;
  7. Passenger load; and
  8. Presence of service animals.

Prioritizing Aviation Accessibility for All

Duckworth led several efforts to make travel easier and more accessible for people with disabilities. Those included in this bill are:

  • Prioritizing Accountability and Accessibility for Aviation Consumers Act of 2023: requires the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) publish an annual report on how quickly, effectively and efficiently consumer complaints related to traveling with a disability are received, addressed and resolved by DOT.
  • Mobility Aids On Board Improve Lives and Empower All (MOBILE) Act: requires DOT issue an advisory circular that provides guidance to airlines on publishing information related to powered wheelchairs, including the dimensions of aircraft cargo holds, and evaluate the frequency and types of mishandling of mobility aids and take actions towards making in-flight wheelchair seating available.
  • Access and Dignity for All People who Travel (ADAPT) Act: requires DOT issue regulations regarding seating accommodations for passengers with disabilities that takes into account being seated next to their companion and requires the Secretary of Transportation establish an optional Known Service Animal Travel Pilot Program, providing service animal users the opportunity to participate in a streamlined pre-registration process.
  • Equal Accessibility to Passenger Portals (Equal APP) Act: requires DOT issue regulations to ensure that customer-facing websites, applications and information communication technologies (ICT) of airlines and airports are accessible. It would require the Secretary to conduct regular audits of such websites, applications and ICTs and allow the Secretary to hold non-compliant entities accountable by issuing civil penalties.
  • Store On-board Wheelchairs in Cabin (STOWIC) Act: requires airlines provide information on the airline website—and anywhere people can make reservations— regarding the rights and responsibilities of both airlines and passengers as to the availability of on-board wheelchairs. It would also require annual staff training regarding assisting people with disabilities on the use of on-board wheelchairs and the right to request an on-board wheelchair. It would allow the Secretary to issue enhanced civil penalties if airlines fail to provide an on-board wheelchair.
  • Airport Accessibility Grants: authorizes a pilot grant program to help airports make their facilities more accessible. The program would be funded at $20 million per year from Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funds.

Safeguarding the 1,500-Hour Rule

In 2009, Colgan Air flight 3407 crashed outside of Buffalo, New York, killing all 50 people onboard. Following this tragedy, Congress passed the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administrative Extension Act, which required all flight crewmembers operating a commercial aircraft under Part 121 to hold an Air Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate and directed the FAA to update qualifications for such ATP certificates to include a minimum of 1,500 hours. The 1,500 hours of flight experience must include enough hours, as determined by the FAA, in difficult operational conditions that may be encountered in air carrier operations. The language gave FAA some flexibility in allowing exemptions for certain structured training programs provided they offer an equivalent level of safety.

Despite efforts to rollback or weaken the 1,500-hour rule, Duckworth advocated to leave the policy as-is, thus helping ensure that pilots have high levels of training and are prepared in the case of life-threatening emergencies.

-30-



Scott, Colleagues Introduce Bill to Save Taxpayers Billions at the Pump and Fuel American Energy Independence

Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Tim Scott

Tuesday | June 13, 2023

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) joined eight of his Senate colleagues in introducing the Pay Less at the Pump Act. This legislation will lower energy prices for Americans by repealing the Inflation Reduction Act’s reinstatement of the $10.5 billion “Superfund Tax” on crude oil and imported petroleum products. By overturning the Democrats’ reckless tax hike on oil and petroleum products, the Pay Less at the Pump Act would bring down energy costs and fuel American energy independence.

“The best way to bring down sky-high prices at the gas pump is by unleashing American energy production—not punishing American energy producers,” said Senator Scott. “That’s why I am proud to work with my colleagues on this important legislation to help keep energy prices low for the American people.”

Senator Scott was joined by Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Jim Risch (R-Idaho), and John Thune (R-S.D.).

Background:

Senator Scott’s work to make America energy independent and make energy more affordable and reliable:

  • Preventing the sale of American crude oil to China and securing American energy independence through the Protecting America’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve from China Act;
  • Introducing the ESCAPE Act which aids NATO allies in gaining energy independence from Russian fuel; and
  • Writing a letter to President Biden urging him to reclaim American energy independence by approving the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Related Issues: