Bennet Applauds New USDA 10-Year Strategy to Invest in America’s Forests

Source: United States Senator for Colorado Michael Bennet

Washington, D.C. – Today, Colorado U.S. Senator Michael Bennet applauded U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Chief Randy Moore’s announcement of their new long-term strategy to address the wildfires affecting the West and make a proactive investment in the health of America’s forests and watersheds.

“I’m glad to see USDA and the Forest Service taking a major step toward addressing the devastating wildfires sweeping the West with this new long-term strategy,” said Bennet. “The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act  provided a significant down payment to begin this desperately needed effort to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire. Looking ahead, we need to support USDA’s work by making a sustained, long-term investment in our forests and watersheds, in line with my Outdoor Restoration Partnership Act. I’ll continue to look for any and every opportunity to make that a reality.”

The USDA strategy, titled “Confronting the Wildfire Crisis: A Strategy for Protecting Communities and Improving Resilience in America’s Forests,” provides a framework to improve forest and watershed health at the landscape-level – across public and private land – to address the wildfires across the West and protect high-risk communities. The new funding from the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) will support this effort and begin to invest in the workforce needed to implement the strategy. Work to implement the strategy will begin in areas identified as highest-risk, including Colorado’s Front Range. 

A leader on forestry and conservation issues for over a decade in the U.S. Senate, Bennet has worked to end fire borrowing and provide USFS with the necessary tools and resources to improve forest and watershed health. 

In April 2021, Bennet introduced the bipartisan, bicameral Outdoor Restoration Partnership Act (ORPA) to invest in our forests and watersheds while creating millions of jobs. President Joe Biden endorsed the bill in his American Jobs Plan, and the historic forestry investment in the House-passed Build Back Better Act is modeled after ORPA. 

Bennet also led the charge to authorize a number of the key tools USDA will use to implement its strategy including the Joint Chiefs’ Landscape Restoration Program, the Water Source Protection Program, and the Good Neighbor Authority. Bennet introduced a bipartisan bill and later secured the provision to formally authorize the Joint Chiefs’ Landscape Restoration Partnership Initiative in the IIJA. In the 2018 Farm Bill, Bennet secured a new authority, the Water Source Protection Program, to support forest health partnerships between the Forest Service and downstream water users. In the 2014 Farm Bill, Bennet led the push to expand Good Neighbor Authority nationwide following a successful pilot program in Colorado.

In September 2017, Bennet introduced the Wildfire Disaster Funding Act (WDFA), which provided the framework for the fire funding fix that Bennet secured in the 2018 Omnibus. In the 2018 Farm Bill, Bennet led the effort to place a greater emphasis on climate and drought and secure new resources for collaborative forest restoration. 

Bennet’s work on forestry and conservation is informed and inspired by Coloradans’ experiences and ideas. After Colorado suffered the three worst wildfires in state history in 2020, Bennet convened the Western Climate Resilience Roundtable to develop a collaborative, consensus-driven set of priorities for western climate resilience. In August 2021, he hosted an “Outdoor Restoration Partnership Act” Tour with stops in Denver, Clear Creek, Grand, and Routt counties to highlight the importance of forest and watershed health to economies throughout Colorado.

More details on USDA’s wildfire crisis strategy are available HERE

Senator Markey: At-Home COVID-19 Tests Need To Be Sold At-Cost, Made More Accessible

Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey

Markey calls on retailers, manufacturers to make at-home COVID tests more affordable, encourages FTC efforts to stop price gouging and protect consumers

Washington (January 19, 2022) – As the Omicron variant continues to spread and demand for at-home COVID-19 tests increases, Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today sent letters – to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), COVID-19 test manufacturers, and retailers – to ensure that Americans have access to affordable and trustworthy at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests. Senator Markey sent letters to eleven manufacturers and nine retailers of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests, urging the companies to make at-home test prices more reasonable for consumers in the midst of the public health emergency.

 

In his letter to the manufacturers, Senator Markey calls on the companies to lower their prices for at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests, citing reports that show at-home tests can cost as little as $2 each to manufacture but sell for $12 or more. 

In his letter to retailers, Senator Markey notes his concerns that the cost of rapid at-home tests sold by retailers appears to be significantly and unreasonably marked up from the wholesale cost of purchasing these tests from manufacturers and wholesalers, and he calls on retailers to sell at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests at cost through the duration of the public health emergency.

“The cost of at-home testing kits can pose a significant barrier to access,” wrote Senator Markey in his letter to at-home COVID-19 test retailers. “As we face an unprecedented wave of COVID cases, manufacturers and retailers must do more to ensure consumers see reasonable prices for these tests.”

 

Senator Markey sent letters to the following manufacturers: Abbott, Access Bio, ACON Laboratories, Becton, Dickinson & Company, Celltrion USA, Ellume Health, iHealth Labs, InBios International, OraSure Technologies, and Quidel.

Senator Markey sent letters to the following retailers: Walmart, Amazon, Kroger, CVS Health, Walgreens, Rite Aid, Sam’s Club, Target, and Costco.

A copy of the letter to manufacturers can be found HERE. A copy of the letter to retailers can be found HERE

In his letters to the manufacturers, Senator Markey requested responses to questions that include: 

  • What is your current per-test cost to manufacture its rapid COVID-19 antigen test? How has that cost fluctuated during the pandemic?
  • What is the current average wholesale price your company charges retailers for its rapid COVID-19 antigen test? How has that price fluctuated during the pandemic?
  • Has your company communicated to the federal government any issues concerning supplies of input materials for its rapid COVID-19 antigen test?
  • What steps has your company taken to keep costs to consumers low for its rapid COVID-19 antigen test? 

In his letters to the retailers, Senator Markey requested responses to questions that include: 

  • What is the average wholesale price per unit your company currently pays for rapid COVID-19 antigen tests? How has that price fluctuated during the pandemic?
  • What is the average retail price per unit your company currently charges for rapid COVID-19 antigen tests? How has that price fluctuated during the pandemic?
  • What steps — aside from an agreement with the federal government — has your company taken to keep costs to consumers low for rapid COVID-19 antigen tests?
  • Have you communicated with the federal government about any issues related to obtaining supplies of rapid COVID-19 antigen tests to sell to consumers?

Senator Markey, along with Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), also sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requesting the agency investigate and put a stop to price gouging and sales scams related to at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests. Media reports reveal that scammers are using the pandemic as an opportunity to take advantage of consumers through predatory and profiteering behavior, including selling fraudulent tests or charging exorbitant prices for tests that have limited availability. As the Biden administration ramps up its efforts to increase production and availability of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests for Americans, Senator Markey and Senator Blumenthal are urging the FTC to take all necessary steps to stop deceptive price-gouging and sales practices.

“I can think of nothing more unfair, deceptive, and harmful than the exploitation of public health concerns for profit during a global emergency,” wrote Senator Markey and Senator Blumenthal in their letter to FTC Chair Lina Khan. “I am encouraged to see FTC’s recent consumer notice on avoiding counterfeit tests,  but as media reports continue to arise about price gouging and scams related to at-home test kits, I strongly urge the FTC to investigate the situation and act as necessary without delay. No one should be allowed to reap a windfall from fear and human suffering.”

A copy of the letter to the FTC can be found HERE

###

“Just the Kind of Shortsighted Power Grab this Body Was Built to Stop”

Source: United States Senator for Kentucky Mitch McConnell

WASHINGTON, D.C.U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) delivered the following remarks today on the Senate floor regarding Democrats’ radical Senate takeover:

“The Democratic Party has had control of Washington for exactly 364 days.

“Tomorrow will mark exactly one year since President Biden was inaugurated on the West Front and promised to ‘unit[e] our people,’ ‘lower the temperature,’ and ‘brin[g] America together.’

“But today, that President and his party will try to use fear and panic to smash the Senate, silence millions of Americans, and seize control of our democracy.

“There’s no shortage of real crises Democrats might consider tackling. The worst inflation in 40 years. A seemingly endless pandemic. Soaring homicides. A border crisis. Russia flirting with war in Europe.

“But the Administration and this Senate majority are focused on none of it. Instead, they’ve been consumed by a fake panic over election laws that seems to exist only in their imaginations.

“Let’s put a few basic facts on the table.

“Fewer than one half of one percent of American adults believe that election law is our country’s most important problem.

“When polls ask people what new federal election laws they want, the most popular response is ‘none of the above.’

“More Americans believe current voting laws are too lax than believe they are too restrictive.

“Let that sink in. You could have taken in hundreds of hours of left-wing rhetoric and media coverage over the past year and had no inkling of this basic fact. Significantly more Americans believe current voting laws are too loose and insecure than believe they are too restrictive.

“Professional liberals have spent three straight years talking down our democracy, except a short period after they liked an election result and questioning elections was briefly off-limits. But the American people are not buying it. Democrats have spent years stoking fear and panic over voting laws and the American people simply do not buy it.

“But while Washington Democrats’ fake panic has failed to persuade the country, it could still deal permanent damage.

“Today, the Senate will need to prevent this factional frenzy from damaging our democracy… damaging the Senate… and damaging our republic forever.

***

“First — our democracy.

“Professional liberals’ fake hysteria over state voting laws is collapsing before our eyes.

“Even normally-friendly media outlets are asking Democrats why a law like Georgia’s is supposed to be outrageous when it is objectively more open than the rules in blue states like Delaware and New York. President Biden’s false statement about one state law earned him ‘four Pinocchios’ from the Washington Post.

“There is no factual standard by which any state in America is creating a civil rights crisis. Not compared to their own pre-pandemic baselines. Not comparing across with other states.

“What’s more, Democrats’ own paper trails refute the notion this is about new state laws from 2021. Three years ago, in 2019, Leader Schumer was already giving interviews about supposed voter suppression. The same conspiracy theories were being pushed. The same ominous buzzwords were in vogue. And three years ago, in 2019, Democrats had already introduced their first version of the legislation they are pushing today.

“This party-line push has never been about securing citizens’ rights. It’s about expanding politicians’ power.

“That’s why their bill tries to weaken voter I.D. laws that are popular with Americans of all races.

“It’s why their bill is stuffed with strange policies that have zero relationship to ballot access.

“New powers for bureaucrats to police citizens’ speech online. New schemes where the federal government would directly fund political campaigns.

“This is not some modest bill about ballot access. It’s a sprawling takeover of our whole political system.

“It was never even intended to attract bipartisan support. This partisan Frankenstein bill that House Democrats slapped together was intended to do one thing only: Give the Senate Democratic Leader a pretext to break the Senate.

***

“Later today, this chamber will host a sad spectacle that has not been seen before in living memory.

“A sitting Senate Majority Leader will attempt a direct assault on the core identity of the Senate. Our colleague from New York will try to kill the character of the institution he is supposed to protect and serve.

“The Democratic Leader once said that breaking the rules to kill the filibuster would turn the Senate into a ‘rubber stamp of dictatorship,’ make America ‘a banana republic,’ and trigger ‘a doomsday for democracy.’

“But several years ago, with no connection to this particular issue, he began talking about shredding minority protections if he ever got power. And now he wants to press that doomsday button.

“The legislative filibuster is a central Senate tradition. It is the indispensable feature of our institution. It makes the Senate serve its founding purpose: forging compromise, cooling passions, and ensuring that new laws earn broad support from a cross-section of our country.

“The Senate is not supposed to be a duplicate House of Representatives with fewer members and fancier desks. This body is not supposed to amplify huge swings in federal law with every election. It exists to slow those swings and bring stability.

“The legislative filibuster is the only reason the Senate provides what James Madison called a ‘complicated check’ on ‘improper acts of legislation.’ It embodies Thomas Jefferson’s principle that ‘great innovations should not be forced on slender majorities.’

“Killing the legislative filibuster, any way it happened, would hugely damage the Senate. But doing so by nuking the rules would destroy the Senate.

“As I’ve explained at some length, this is true on the most practical level. A Senate in nuclear winter would not be a hospitable place for either side. As then-Senator Obama explained a decade and a half ago, “if the majority chooses to end the filibuster, if they choose to change the rules and put an end to democratic debate, then the fighting and the bitterness and the gridlock will only get worse.”

“Please note that, even in the Democratic Leader’s manufactured case, even when he presumably wanted the most persuasive theater he could possibly muster, the Senate will only have spent about a day and a half on this bill before he tries to ram it through. Since when does the Senate pass any significant bill in a day and a half, much less a gigantic elections overhaul?

“Our colleague is not trying to conclude an unending discussion that he cannot stop. He is trying to short-circuit a debate that he cannot win.

“This is just the kind of shortsighted power grab this body was built to stop.

***

“The case that most of our Democratic colleagues are making this week boils down to a claim that everything is broken.

“The Senate is broken because they can’t get everything they want.

“Our democracy is broken because Democrats sometimes lose.

“Entire states are broken because the voters vote the wrong way and so their voices in this chamber should be totally silenced. Millions of American voters should be denied any say whatsoever in this chamber.

“Really, our Democratic colleagues claiming our entire Republic is broken. That’s what their anger and pessimism boils down to.

“They say we’re hopelessly divided. That governing institutions that have served us for centuries need to be smashed and steamrolled. That we are fated to keep escalating brute-force battles with no end in sight.

“This is exactly the kind of toxic worldview that this President pledged to disavow. But it is exactly what has consumed his party on his watch.

“You can literally hear it in their voices. In the last few days, our President and his top allies have been reduced to shouting angrily at reporters and at the American people.

“They are so certain they know best. How dare the rules, the facts, the Republicans, and millions of voters all obstruct their wisdom?

“The good news, Mr. President, is that the fear is false. The rage is misplaced. And today, factional fevers will not carry the day.

“The Senate is not broken. We’ve passed major bipartisan bills this past year and we’ve stopped partisan bills that lacked support. Exactly the mixture the framers imagined and Senators on both sides praised until the last few months.

“Our democracy is not broken, either. Citizens across America have ample opportunity to vote and they say so to everybody who will listen.

“And our Republic is not broken. Even with all the crises that Democrats’ policies have created, we remain fellow citizens who are blessed to live in the greatest country on Earth.

“Today, it appears that a narrow bipartisan majority of Senators will vote to save the Senate. With hope, with confidence, we will stand up and say that our institutions are worth protecting. That rules matter. That no American deserves to have his or her voice in this chamber silenced.

“But a partisan minority will do the opposite. They will try to smash and grab as much short-term power as they can carry.

“For both groups of Senators, this vote will echo for generations. Before we part ways tonight, all 100 of us will have marked our legacies in permanent ink.

“Who will vote with hope and confidence in our people — and who will vote from anger, fear, and fake panic?

“Who will vote to protect checks and balances — and who will try to purchase power at any price?

“Who has the courage to protect every single American’s voice in this chamber, no matter their home state, no matter their politics — and who will vote to silence millions of citizens for the sin of voting for the wrong team?

“The American people deserve to know.

“And from this day forward, they will.”

Jobs, Economic Opportunity, And More – Heinrich Touts Major Airport, Highway, Bridge Infrastructure Investments For New Mexico During Visit To Los Lunas, Belen

Source: United States Senator for New Mexico Martin Heinrich

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is delivering $3.7 billion to New Mexico through formula funding alone, with additional competitive funding heading to the state through grant programs

WASHINGTON (Jan. 18, 2022) – Today, U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) visited with local officials and business leaders to highlight how historic investments from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law are creating jobs and economic opportunity while positively impacting New Mexico airports, roads, and bridges.

PHOTOS: Heinrich Touts Major Airport, Highway, Bridge Infrastructure Investments For New Mexico

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, is already investing $18 million in runways, taxiways, safety and sustainability projects, as well as terminal, airport-transit connections, and roadway projects at airports across New Mexico.

Senator Heinrich visited Belen Regional Airport today to highlight how New Mexico airports will receive $90 million through formula funding for infrastructure development for airports over the next five years. 

“Local airports connect communities all across New Mexico to tourism, business opportunities, and commercial aviation,” said Heinrich. “These historic investments in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will modernize our airports and allow them to better serve travelers, health care providers, and businesses all across our state.”

Senator Heinrich fought for these historic airport investments as well as monumental relief funding in the American Rescue Plan that have allowed New Mexico airports to recover, rebuild, and focus on job and economic opportunities. 

Senator Heinrich also visited the site of the new I-25 offramp in Los Lunas, a project that he helped secure $25 million in grant funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). This federal funding is the result of a multi-year effort by Senator Heinrich that is being used to design and construct a new interchange on I-25 at Morris Road, a river crossing, four signalized intersections, and approximately four miles of four-lane highway. Los Lunas has experienced heavy commuter traffic and this interchange will work to relieve congestion caused by traffic, railway crossings, and construction.

During his visit, Senator Heinrich highlighted that more New Mexico projects are going to see the same type of progress through the Infrastructure Law. In December 2021, Senator Heinrich announced that, based on formula funding alone, New Mexico is expecting to receive approximately $2.8 billion over five years in federal highway formula funding authorized by this new law. On an average annual basis, this is about 29.7% more than the State’s Federal-aid highway formula funding under current law. This funding will help to create good-paying jobs and improve roads and bridges across the state.

“Transportation infrastructure is what connects us all and is fundamental to a thriving economy,” said Heinrich. “These substantial transportation investments from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will have real-life impacts on New Mexicans, including new jobs, safer roads, and better public transportation.”

New Mexico is also set to receive a total of $225 million over five years as part of the largest bridge formula program in American history. New Mexico will receive $45 million for Fiscal Year 2022 under the new program to address highway bridge needs. The funding is available to improve the condition of 207 bridges in poor condition across the state. 

###

 

Hoeven Secures $61.45 Million for Permanent Flood Protection in Minot Region

Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

01.19.22

Funding Fulfills Federal Commitment for Souris River Valley Flood Protection Project

MINOT, N.D. – Senator John Hoeven today announced that he worked with Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Shalanda Young to secure $61.45 million in federal funding for permanent flood protection in the Souris River Valley. This funding, which is the latest in Hoeven’s efforts to advance the region’s flood protection, will fulfill the federal funding commitment and provide the funding necessary to complete phase 4, which will tie the previous three phases together and provide protection to 60 percent of the region’s residents.

“We’ve worked hard over the last decade to secure the federal funding and approval to advance permanent flood protection in the region,” said Hoeven. “This $61.45 million in federal funding will fulfill the federal commitment for the project and enable completion of phase 4. This is a big win for the community and will help to ensure the safety and well-being of those living in the Souris River Valley, as well as the region’s long-term economic stability and growth.” 

Hoeven has been working to advance the region’s flood protection project, including: 

  • Working with Director Young, as well as Army Corps and DoD leadership to secure funding for the project.
  • Successful efforts with Senator Cramer to authorize the project in the year-end legislation passed by Congress in December 2020.
  • Securing a $9.8 million Defense Community Infrastructure Program (DCIP) award for the City of Minot’s support the fifth phase of the region’s flood protection project, the 4th Avenue tieback levee system in northeastern Minot, and enable the construction of approximately 2,400 feet of new floodwall, one removable closure through the floodwall and approximately 2,100 feet of municipal roadway reconstruction

-###-



Hoeven & Klobuchar Work with OMB Director to Secure $437 Million for Comprehensive Flood Protection in the Red River Valley

Source: United States Senator for North Dakota John Hoeven

01.19.22

Award Completes the $750 Million Federal Funding Commitment

WASHINGTON – Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) today announced that, through their efforts with Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Shalanda Young, they have secured $437 million of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers funding for the construction of permanent flood protection in the Red River Valley. With this award, the project has now received the complete federal funding commitment of $750 million.

Hoeven and Klobuchar have been working closely with OMB to advance this award and recently met with Director Young and local leaders from the Fargo-Moorhead region to make the case for fully funding the project. The senators, along with Senators Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) and Tina Smith (D-Minn.), alsoraised these priorities with Young in a letter sent in November. 

“This $437 million fulfills the entire federal funding commitment for the project, providing certainty that it will be built on or ahead of schedule and ensuring the Red River Valley is permanently protected against the threat of flooding,” said Senator Hoeven. “This project is the first in the nation to use the P3 model, making today’s funding announcement a tremendous milestone for the Fargo-Moorhead region and an example the Army Corps can use for other projects nationwide. I appreciate Senator Klobuchar for working with us to secure this funding during a critical time in the project’s development.”

“This is a major win for the entire Fargo-Moorhead community,” said Senator Klobuchar. “With this federal funding, we will be able to continue construction on the Fargo-Moorhead Flood Diversion project and provide permanent flood protections for more than 200,000 people. I’m proud to have partnered with Senator Hoeven to secure this investment and will continue advocating to ensure flooding problems in the area are addressed in a timely manner.”

Today’s announcement builds on Hoeven and Klobuchar’s past work to advance permanent flood protection in the Red River Valley. Last year, the senators reviewed these efforts in a roundtable with state, local and Army Corps officials in Fargo and discussed progress on the I-29 grade increase and the initial excavation of the Red River Control Structure site.

-###-



Cassidy Announces $643.4M from Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill for Louisiana Coastal, Waterway and Flood Projects AND $2B in Disaster Relief

Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy

Project Name

Description from Army Corps of Engineers

Amount

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA

Funds will be used to complete construction of the project.

$77,600,000

ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA

Funds will be used to complete the construction of the Charenton Floodgate and construct priority levee enlargements, address critical seepage remediation, and floodwall stability for Bayou Larose; Alabama Bayou; W121; E-73.3-E74; E-52; E-58; W-124; and W-99.

$85,000,000

BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA

Dredging and removal of obstruction in response to Hurricane Ida.

$3,510,000

CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENTS, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN

Funds will be used to construct new revetments and extensions of existing revetments using Articulated Concrete Mattress and/or stone berms at Tropical Bend River Mile (RM) 31; Burnside RM 43-R; Point Michel RM 44-R; Myrtle Grove RM 59-R (two locations); Good Hope RM 61; Carrollton RM 68; Third District Reach RM 71 (three locations); English Turn RM 78-R; Scarsdale RM 80 (two locations); Linwood RM 82; Harlem RM 88; Gravolet RM 90 (two locations); Neptune RM 97 (three locations); Greenville RM 100-R; Carrollton RM 104-L; Richbend RM 157-R; and Buras RM 297.

$120,543,000

COMITE RIVER DIVERSION*

Construct resiliency features including reinforcing the channel banks rip rap, fabric, and bedding; and armoring along rock chutes.

$125,000,000

GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA

ADDITIONAL DAMAGES DUES TO HURRICANE IDA – PIR UNDERWAY IN ADDITION TO FOLLOWING. The previously proposed repairs include clearing and grubbing, excavation, repairs to clay-filled geotextile, repairs to sand-filled geotextile tube, repairs to a timber dune crossing, placement of a sand-filled geotextile tube with scour apron and anchor tubes on top of the existing clay-filled geotextile tube, re-covering the repaired and newly placed geotextile tubes, dune plantings and sand fencing. In addition, a 750 foot reach of dune section at Boudreaux lane will be restored and brought up to grade.

TBD

GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA

This work package is for E&D of repairs that include clearing and grubbing, excavation, repairs to clay-filled geotextile, repairs to sand-filled geotextile tube, repairs to a timber dune crossing, placement of a sand-filled geotextile tube with scour apron and anchor tubes on top of the existing clay-filled geotextile tube, recovering the repaired and newly placed geotextile tubes, dune plantings and sand fencing. In addition, a 750 foot reach of dune section at Boudreaux lane will be restored and brought up to grade.

$798,000

GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA

Repair or Replace equipment shed roof, 4 automatic gate sensors, water damaged ceiling tile, PLC wiring at Harvey Lock. Repair or Replace 7 lights on 2 high masts, 2 high mast light lifting mechanisms, damaged electrical equipment on 2 high mast lights, lockmaster office roof, life ring holders, tin covering over air compressors, siding on operator shacks and awnings at Algiers Lock. Repair or Replace chamber wall lights, roofs, soffit, insulation and ceiling tiles, and reverse head gate electric motor at Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock. All repairs to these locks are in response to Hurricane Ida.

$340,000

LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)

Construction – Repair erosion of approximately 7,000CY of wave berm clay spanning 8,100 LF of levee along the Jefferson Parish Lake Pontchartrain Lakefront.

$4,750,000

LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)

E&D – Repair erosion of approximately 7,000CY of wave berm clay spanning 8,100 LF of levee along the Jefferson Parish Lake Pontchartrain Lakefront.

$250,000

LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LA

FCCE Class 1 – Construction and E&D – Repairs to the Louisiana State Penitentiary (Angola Ring Levee).

$793,000

MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN

Funds will be used to construct priority levee enlargements and to address critical seepage remediation at Dugas to Celotex, RM 100.4-R; Moreville-Black Hawk Items 326-R, 348-R, 351-R, 327-R, 341-R, and 345-R; Addis RM 223-R; Ama, RM 113.5-R; Bayou Goula to Alhambra RM 194.5R; Belmont RM 152-L; Ben Hur Road RM 217.6-L; Carville RM 189-L; Lower & Upper 5th RM 317-R; Fancy Point RM 242.5-R; Gramercy Mt. Airy RM 144-L; IHNC Lock Forebay RM 92.6L; Laplace RM 133-L; Marchand RM 181-L; Plaquemine-Reveille RM 206.7-R; Point Pleasant-Yucatan Items 409 and 411-R; Port Allen Lock RM 228-R and RM 231-R; Romeville – College Point RM 156-8L; Smithfield RM 246-R; Smoke Bend RM 178-R; St. Joseph – Waterproof Item 393-R; Thomas Point RM 240.3R; Upper Lake Concordia-Vidalia Items 366-R, 367-R, 368-R, and 370-R; Welham Plantation RM 154-L; and Yucatan- Lake Bruin Item 398-R Phase II.

$232,425,000

MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA

Repair or Replace Down fences, Swing Gates, Foreshore Rock, Wall, Ceiling, Floor, Roof, Temporary Trailers, VHF antenna, Safety light, and Mold remediation at Venice Suboffice. Dredge Navigation channel at South Pass and Place Jetty stone at South and Southwest Pass. All repairs are in response to Hurricane Ida.

$27,116,000

NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE (NOV) PROJECT

PIR Underway – TBD

TBD

NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION)

Complete authorized work on the east and west banks of Plaquemines Parish by replacing or modifying the flood and storm damage risk reduction levee infrastructure to the 50-year Level or Risk Reduction (LORR).

$783,000,000

SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LA

Within the Algiers Sub-basin, complete design of three features of the project and initiate construction of one feature of the project.

$94,300,000

WEST BANK AND VICINITY (WBV) PROJECT

PIR Underway – TBD

TBD

WEST SHORE, LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA*

Complete authorized work on the east and west banks of Plaquemines Parish by replacing or modifying the flood and storm damage risk reduction levee infrastructure to the 50-year Level or Risk Reduction (LORR).

$450,000,000

$2,005,425,000

*Funds will be allocated upon completion of a study funded in the Investigations Acct if the study recommends a construction project with a Federal interest.

Murkowski Announces Significant Funding for Alaska from Bipartisan Infrastructure Act

Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski

01.19.22

Projects in Nome, Seward, North Pole, and Kenai Peninsula to Receive Funding

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) today announced that as a result of the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which she played a lead role in crafting and advancing into law last year, four more projects in Alaska have been selected to receive substantial federal funding.

Today’s announcement, which follows last week’s announcement of $25 million for the Denali Park Road, includes $250 million for the Port of Nome; $185 million for the Lowell Creek flood diversion project in Seward; $88 million for the Moose Creek Dam Project in North Pole; and $28 million for the Kenai Bluffs Bank Stabilization Project.

“This announcement – made possible by our bipartisan infrastructure bill – is worthy of celebration. These projects are real-life, boots-on-the-ground examples of the priorities we addressed through this historic law. I’m proud of our work on it and thrilled by the results it is already producing for our state,” said Senator Murkowski. “Each of these infrastructure projects is timely and necessary and will make a difference in our state. They are critical to economic development, America’s role in an evolving Arctic, community safety, our response to natural hazards, and more. I thank the administration for joining Alaskans in recognizing the importance of these projects.”

Murkowski was a lead author and negotiator of the bipartisan infrastructure package, which became law on November 15, 2021. For more information about it, please click here.

 

###

Related Issues: Infrastructure


On Senate Floor, Portman Opposes Democrats’ Radical Voting Overhaul Bill & Effort To Dismantle Key Senate Institution That Incentives Bipartisanship

Source: United States Senator for Ohio Rob Portman

January 18, 2022 | Press Releases

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) delivered remarks on the Senate floor this afternoon outlining his opposition to Democrats’ controversial, sweeping “voting rights” legislation. Portman detailed the numerous problems with the legislation before chiding Democrats for using this issue to fan the flames of division and partisanship in the country. Portman also voiced his opposition to Democrats’ plan to dismantle the legislative filibuster, which brings members together and leads to bipartisan, sustainable laws — citing the bipartisan infrastructure law as an example. Instead, he called on Senators from both sides of the aisle to work together on common-sense solutions, such as reforming the Electoral Count Act.

A transcript of his remarks can be found below and a video can be found here. 

 

“Mr. President, I was asked recently what I think is the number one issue facing America. It’s a tough question. I had a lot of issues raised through my mind: inflation, the debt workforce issues, the crisis at our Southern border, the explosion of COVID cases, the deadly opioid epidemic, a warming planet, Russia and China flexing their muscles and creating more volatility around the world. We’ve got plenty of challenges, don’t we? “But you know what I landed on? What I think is our biggest problem? It’s the increasing division, even polarization, of our politics and our country. It’s what makes it so hard to address all those other issues that I named that are so important to the families we represent. 

“Last week on the Senate floor, my Democratic colleague from Arizona, Senator Sinema, called it ‘a disease of division.’ Well put. When we’re together, this country can achieve great things and has over the years. It can provide a beacon of hope to a troubled world. But as Lincoln warned, a house divided against itself cannot stand. In this body, we should be figuring out how to come together to help America stand and stand strong to address our many challenges. That’s why I’m so discouraged by what I see playing out on the U.S. Senate floor again this week.

“I see an attempt by Democratic leadership to fan the flames of distrust. I see an attempt to further divide an already splintered country. Both by exaggerated arguments being made to advance controversial legislation opposed by every single Republican regarding the tough issue of voting. And then to try to achieve this purely partisan objective by changing a foundation of the Senate, to dismantle the one Senate rule, the legislative filibuster, that works to bring us together rather than pull us apart. 

“Equally troubling to me is that this seems to be a purely political exercise now in that the conclusion seems predetermined. Apparently the Senate is being dragged through this divisive and ugly partisan debate knowing that it will not achieve a legislative result, but only a deepening and hardening of the political lines in each camp.

“Here in the Senate, most Republicans and most Democrats say they want to bring the country together. I think they’re sincere about that. This message was an explicit part of President Biden’s campaign for President. Yet there is nothing about the harsh partisan rhetoric from the president’s speech on this topic in Atlanta last week or much of the floor debate this week and last week that does anything but push our country further apart. 

“First, the substance of the legislative fight: Democrats have been highly critical of those Republicans who refuse to accept the results of the 2020 election, pointing out accurately that dozens of lawsuits failed to show adequate fraud to change the result. They have attacked some Republicans because they had said that the election was rigged for questioning the state-by-state certification process that has led to deeper rifts in our nation and a significant number of Republican voters questioning the legitimacy of the election. I get that. So why now are Democratic leaders and President Biden using the exact same language, literally saying the elections are rigged, literally saying that? Why are they perpetrating their own election narrative that does not fit the facts, but serves to push both sides deeper into their own camps and in particular now leads Democrats to think elections are illegitimate.  

“Majority Leader Schumer claims, ‘Republicans are pushing voter suppression and election nullification laws.’ President Biden has compared state efforts to tighten up election administration to Jim Crow laws, compared Republicans to notorious racists in our history. These attacks are overwrought, exaggerated, and deeply divisive. Here’s what the nonpartisan and respected group called No Labels has said about the Democratic attacks, ‘If you dig into these state legislative proposals, you’ll find most entail tightening up procedures pertaining to registration, mail and absentee voting and voter ID laws that were loosened in 2020 in the name of making it safer for people to vote amid the COVID pandemic. Many leading Democrats and Liberal commentators have taken to describing these measures as Jim Crow 2.0, which is to say they are somehow worse than the original Jim Crow era, which entailed poll taxes and literacy tests, violent intimidation of Black voters by the KKK, and even outright prohibition on black voters participating in party primaries in Southern States. To suggest that any voting measures being debated today in America are somehow worse than this is simply irresponsible demagoguery.’ That comes from No Labels, which is a nonpartisan group, Democrats and Republicans trying to find that middle ground.

“Now, to be fair, this group has been critical of Republican claims of widespread election fraud that cannot be backed up. So what are the actual facts? First, the Constitution guarantees all citizens 18 years of age or older the right to vote in elections, regardless of race or gender, period. The Federal Voting Rights Act reaffirms that right and makes it enforceable in federal court. In 2006, Congress voted in a bipartisan way to reauthorize this important law for 25 years, through 2031. I voted for and strongly support the Voting Rights Act and have long supported other common-sense efforts to increase voter confidence in our elections. In fact, there is a bipartisan effort underway right now to deal with a real problem to ensure that after the fact certified elections are respected. This will require making overdue reforms to the Electoral Count Act and some other reasonable updates to federal election procedures. I’m happy to be working with a small group of Senate Democrats and Senate Republicans on those efforts. That’s how the system should work. We’re not going to agree on everything, but we can sit down and talk and find common ground to address problems.  

“What Republicans and most Americans don’t support is an unprecedented federal takeover of our election system, which is what the overly broad, party-line bills proposed this week by the Democrats will do. Let me be clear. Despite what Democratic leaders are saying to jam these bills through Congress, our democracy is not, as they say, in crisis because it is too hard to vote. We just had a national election in 2020 with the highest voter turnout in 120 years. 94% of voters said it was easy for them to vote. This is according to the Pew Research Center, 94 percent. That’s good. Some have said drastic changes are needed at the federal level because the States are now enacting voter restrictions. Some point to the liberal Brennan Center, which reports that 19 states have enacted laws which it characterizes as restricting the right to vote. As noted above, again by the nonpartisan No Labels group, when you really look at these laws, the truth is that they largely make modest changes in election law administration, such as the date that voters may apply for mail in ballots. We’re ensuring voters are who they say they are through voter ID and other signature requirements. Something, by the way, the vast majority of Americans support. Some of the laws return to state practices closer to the status quo before the pandemic. As an example, some laws reduced the number of ballot drop boxes in cases where there were no ballot drop boxes before COVID.

“And many of the States the Democrats criticized for improving their election process are enacting laws similar to those that have long been in place in states represented by Democrats, so called blue States. For example, under its new law, Georgia has a limit of 17 days of in person early voting, 17 days. New Jersey and New York have nine days of in person voting. Connecticut doesn’t have any early voting. Georgia has also added one extra Saturday of early voting. Georgia’s new requirement that voters provide their driver’s license or state ID numbers when applying for mail-in and ballots, which Democrats have criticized, is the same as laws in Maryland and Pennsylvania. Rhode Island enacted a voter ID law a decade ago. And with regard to President Biden’s home state, the Atlantic has noted that ‘few States have more limited voting options than Delaware.’ 

“I frankly have not heard Democratic leadership calling out any of these Democrat majority states for pushing what they deem to be voter suppression. I don’t know anyone who doesn’t believe it should be easy to vote and hard to cheat. Every state has to find that balance, but they have to find it while not violating the Voting Rights Act. I don’t agree with every policy every state has in place. I find some too restrictive. As an example, I support no fault absentee voting, as we do in Ohio. It works well. You don’t have to have a reason, you can vote absentee. I like to see every mailbox, in a sense, be a ballot box, in essence. I find that some of the laws in some of the states lack adequate security, on the other hand. For example, I think some form of ID is smart, as do the vast majority of Americans. But in our federal system, within the guardrails of the Voting Rights Act and consistent with the Constitution, that decision is left up to state legislatures, closer to the people and accountable to the voters. That’s just a fundamental philosophical difference we have here on the Senate floor. We see it play out on lots of issues. And now on this one. 

“I’m very proud of the job that my state of Ohio and our bipartisan election officials in every county do in our elections. In the last election, we had a record 5.97 million Ohioans cast a vote. More voters than ever. It represented 74 percent of eligible voters in our state, the second highest percentage in the history of Ohio. Despite the challenges of running the highest turnout election in our state’s history during an unprecedented pandemic, it was widely regarded as the most secure and most successful Ohio election ever. Now is not the time to take the responsibility away from Ohio state and local officials. Article one, Section four of the Constitution clearly assigns that authority over elections to the States. Alexander Hamilton acknowledged in Federalist 59 that only in extraordinary circumstances should the federal government become involved in election law, explaining that allowing the federal government to run elections would have been, ‘premeditated engine for the destruction of state governments.’ We are not in extraordinary circumstances right now. 

“In general, it’s become easier and easier to vote in America, and that’s a good thing. And it’s become easier to vote in America than many other democracies around the world. And that’s good too. Easy to vote, hard to cheat. Despite all the fiery speeches on the floor stating the contrary over the past week, according to a recent survey from Morning Consult, only 33 percent of American adults think it’s too hard for eligible voters to vote. A larger share – 44 percent — actually think current rules aren’t strict enough. Having heard the debate, this is what voters think. 

“Not only are Democrats attempting a federal takeover of our election system, but because they have chosen to change the constitutionally based election system in a purely partisan way, they don’t have the 60 votes necessary to get something passed here in the United States Senate. That’s why, instead of reaching out to find a bipartisan way forward, they are also proposing to fundamentally change the longstanding rules of the Senate. Specifically, they are proposing to do away with what’s called the legislative filibuster in order to advance their federal election takeover bills by a simple majority instead of the normal 60 votes. This 60 vote margin, the legislative filibuster, is the one tool left to encourage bipartisanship, not just here in the Senate, but in our system. In the House. At the White House. Yes, it provides important minority rights in the Senate that protect the country from legislation that is too far out of the mainstream, and it helps pass good legislation like Medicare or Social Security with big votes, big margins that means those programs can be sustained and they can be relied upon. That’s good for our country.

“Most importantly to me, the legislative filibuster is the one thing that encourages us to work in a bipartisan way. The successful passage of the bipartisan infrastructure law last year is a good example. I was in the middle of those negotiations. We knew we had to achieve 60 votes in a 50-50 Senate. What did that mean? That meant that we had to find common ground. We had to make concessions on both sides in order to get to 60 votes. As a result, we got well over 60, into the 70s and a good piece of legislation that was able to pass the House and be signed into law and is now in place as sustainable, reliable legislation. Did I agree with everything in it? No, nor did anybody else. But to get to those 60 votes, we all had to make certain concessions. 

“Although it’s a Senate rule, the legislative filibuster also requires members of the House of Representatives to come up with more bipartisan solutions because they know their legislation has to pass the Senate if they want it to become law. Just as I have been a committed bipartisan legislator here in the Senate for the past eleven years, the same was true in the House for twelve years, where I regularly used the fact that we needed 60 votes in the Senate to force colleagues on both sides of the aisle to come together and find a way to pass legislation in a bipartisan manner. When I was an Executive Branch in two Cabinet level jobs in the Bush 43 administration and as Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs for Bush 41, that 60 vote necessity in the Senate calmed the passions within the administration and forced us to find common ground to work in a more bipartisan manner, resulting in more effective results that last the test of time. 

“I know the benefits to our country of requiring more than a bare Senate majority that shifts back and forth because I’ve lived it in the House, in the Senate, and in the White House. And it’s not just me or other Republicans now saying that the legislative filibuster is good for our federal system. Less than five years ago, 32 Senate Democrats, including then Senator, and now Vice President, Kamala Harris, joined with me and other Republicans in signing an open letter insisting the legislative filibuster should not change. This was at a time when there was a Democrat in the White House, but Republicans controlled the Senate. It appears that those 32 Democrats were happy to defend the filibuster as good for the country when they were in the minority, but not now, when the country is even further divided and they have a majority.

“All but a couple of those members have shifted their views. I would encourage my Democratic colleagues to re-read their own letter which makes such a compelling case that this is about the country, not about one political party or another. Back in 2005, when Senator Schumer called abolishing the filibuster, ‘a temper tantrum by those on the hard right’ who ‘want their way every single time.’ That was in 2005. Now he is majority leader and he has changed his tune.

“This seems shortsighted to me since the history of the Senate is to change the majority regularly. We don’t know who’s going to be in the majority in the next Senate. Could the Senate rules be improved to allow more debate and more progress on legislation? Absolutely. There’s bipartisan interest in this and we should turn it into something constructive. After this political exercise we’re going through right now we should turn to the issue of reforming the rules around here. Let’s have each Leader choose a few interested members. Let’s hammer out a bipartisan proposal that allows more amendments and makes it easier to get legislation passed. It’s not that hard. But eliminating the one tool that forces us to come together makes it harder to address those many challenges we face. It makes it harder to pass legislation broadly supported and sustainable to actually help the people we represent.

“And that’s what we were elected to do. That’s our job. Not inflame the passions of our most committed and hardline supporters, but achieve results. And as I said at the outset, between inflation and COVID, our Southern border and more, we’ve got plenty to do. I urge my Democratic colleagues to step back from the brink, to think twice before trying to destroy what has made the US Senate such a unique and valuable part of the world’s longest lasting and most successful democracy.

“And I urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to support sensible rules changes and recommit to use the 60 vote margin responsibly to generate consensus and find that elusive common ground that will best serve those we represent and that will keep our great Republic the envy of the world. I yield back my time.”

###

Booker Announces Introduction of Bill to Ban Surveillance Advertising

Source: United States Senator for New Jersey Cory Booker

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) announced the introduction of the Banning Surveillance Advertising Act, legislation that prohibits advertising networks and facilitators from using personal data to target advertisements, with the exception of broad location targeting to a recognized place, such as a municipality. The bill also prohibits advertisers from targeting ads based on protected class information, such as race, gender, and religion, and personal data purchased from data brokers. The bill makes explicit that contextual advertising, which is advertising based on the content a user is engaging with, is allowable. Congresswomen Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) introduced the Banning Surveillance Advertising Act today in the House. 

“Surveillance advertising is a predatory and invasive practice. The hoarding of people’s personal data not only abuses privacy, but also drives the spread of misinformation, domestic extremism, racial division, and violence,” saidSenator Booker. “With the introduction of the Ban Surveillance Advertising Act, advertisers will be forced to stop exploiting individuals’ online behavior for profits and our communities will be safer as a result.”

“The ‘surveillance advertising’ business model is premised on the unseemly collection and hoarding of personal data to enable ad targeting. This pernicious practice allows online platforms to chase user engagement at great cost to our society, and it fuels disinformation, discrimination, voter suppression, privacy abuses, and so many other harms. The surveillance advertising business model is broken,” said Rep. Eshoo. “I’m proud to partner with Senator Booker and Congresswoman Schakowsky on legislation to ban this toxic business model that causes irreparable harm to consumers, businesses, and our democracy.”

“Surveillance advertising is at the heart of every exploitative online business model that exacerbates manipulation, discrimination, misinformation, extremism, and fundamentally violates people’s privacy in ways they would never choose if given a true choice. The Banning Surveillance Advertising Act will put a stop to this repulsive practice and therefore protect consumers by removing the financial incentive for companies to exploit consumers’ personal information and help stop a morass of online harms. I’m proud to join my colleagues Representative Eshoo and Senator Booker to stop this poisonous practice,” said Rep. Schakowsky. “I remain committed to passing bipartisan, comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation, and I believe a ban on this practice should be a part of any such privacy law. I look forward to continued discussion with Energy and Commerce Members on both sides of the aisle in order to achieve this outcome.”

The Banning Surveillance Advertising Act is supported by leading public interest organizations, academics, and companies with privacy-preserving business models, including the following:

  • Public interest organizations
    • Accountable Tech
    • Ranking Digital Rights
    • Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
    • Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
    • Demand Progress
    • Common Sense Media
    • Consumer Federation of America (CFA)
    • Center for Digital Democracy
    • FairPlay

 

  • Companies
    • DuckDuckGo
    • Neeva
    • Beeper
    • Proton

 

  • Academics
    • Shoshana Zuboff, Professor Emerita at Harvard Business School and author of The Age of Surveillance Capitalism
    • Woodrow Hartzog, Professor of Law and Computer Science at Northeastern University and author of Privacy’s Blueprint
    • Joan Donovan, Research Director, Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy 
    • Carissa Veliz, Associate Professor, University of Oxford and author of Privacy is Power
    • Dipayan Ghosh, Co-Director of the Digital Platforms & Democracy Project at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy and author of Terms of Disservice
    • Ramesh Srinivasan, Professor and Director, UC Digital Cultures Lab, author of Beyond the Valley
    • Matthew Crain, Assistant Professor of Media & Communication, Miami University and author of Profit over Privacy: How Surveillance Advertising Conquered the Internet

Quotes from endorsing organizations can be viewed here.

The full text of the legislation can be viewed here.